so why is the international server in english?

and not the superior language of esperanto?

hes lying btw

no one doxxes themselves this bad

how old are you

not old enough to be apathetic i assume

you can get ur lil boy booty destroyed young man

imagine unironically trying to use 'no u' as a counter argument

gee that seems kinda hard

not sure im up to the task

no i mean i might have some trouble

materials not an issue

its a lil worse than that

dude it literally was lmao

the original copies were written in a time period where greek was very prevalent

@Deleted User ur trying to deny a basic fact m8

the evidence is piled against you in this claim that ur making

and they didnt write it all in palestine as well

the new testament that is

thats literally the opposite of what i said

are you pretending to be retarded

i dont have that information off the top of my head

hold up

whether or not there was a hebrew version

there is no concrete evidence

only speculation

what we do have is evidence of the greek texts

the first bible was the old testament you retard

the new testament was written by the apostles and other people in later years

we're not denying that

you just have to remember the temporal divide between the old and the new

the specifics of the old testament are irrelevant lmao

i think ur just arguing for the sake of arguing at this point

because theyre irrelevant

especially in a discussion about the new testament

@Deleted User the old testament is jewish, the new testament is christian

not a hard concept

the old testament has almost nothing on jesus christ

@Deleted User what kind of proof do you want?

dude youre being ignorant on purpose, you wanna get spoonfed info instead of actually doing research

@Deleted User alrighty then

disproving baseless claims

here we go bois

will you accept wikipedia or is that not reliable enough for you

because of "da joos" or w/e

its not necessarily a rabbi

could simply be someone who is knowledgable in the subject

https://bibleask.org/does-jesus-appear-in-the-old-testament/

heres something about the only appearance of christ in the old testament

but fr dude

whats the point of debating if you only debate in bad faith

but anyway the website basically makes the claim that jesus never actually appeared "in the flesh"

@Deleted User read the entire thing

theyre all interpretations of christ

from a quick google search of the actual quote in question

jesus was never once mentionned

13 Now when Joshua was near Jericho, he looked up and saw a man standing in front of him with a drawn sword in his hand. Joshua went up to him and asked, “Are you for us or for our enemies?”

14 “Neither,” he replied, “but as commander of the army of the Lord I have now come.” Then Joshua fell facedown to the ground in reverence, and asked him, “What message does my Lord[a] have for his servant?”

15 The commander of the Lord’s army replied, “Take off your sandals, for the place where you are standing is holy.” And Joshua did so.

do you see jesus in there?

im giving you the actual quote from the bible

thats from an inherently biased website article

because theyre looking for anything to spread their religion my dude

what?

this entire argument has been run off of assumptions my dude

if you read that article to its full degree they make multiple assumptions as well

good baseless claim but k

im going to spell it out here since i dont think youre getting it

and thisll be my last bit before i go since this feels like a waste of time

bibleask.org is a source for christians to ask for questions concerning the bible

from a group of incredibly committed christians

thats not the point

just hold on

the people publishing these answers, especially the original posted article, havent actually posted any kind of concrete evidence just interpretations

guided by their faith

in each of those passages

you can see that it only referes to the LORD or to some kind of divinity

this is going over your head isnt it

they never refer to jesus in name

they never use the word christ either

you can doubt whatever you want

we've posted the evidence

the info is out there

if thats still not enough then w/e

what source?

you havent posted anything at all m8

oh the article?

dude you can search up every single one of those bible passages

not a single one of them mentions jesus or christ

the article is making an interpretation of the passages

first off, we have absolutely no evidence that its a priest writting this (whatever you mean by that)

in terms of historical factors such as this, they are yes

because they are too involved with the source matter to give a reliably objective analysis

or do i need to explain that to you too?

not necessarily, but in this case yes because he has ulterior motives that drift away from just getting the facts

due to the nature of his position

wanting to validate his religion?

do i have to explain everything to you>?

nothing, it just doesnt make him the best source for these sorts of things because he has personal connections to them that can influence the objective writing

anyway im done for real pce