Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 451516361836068865


2018-05-30 22:41:26 UTC  

bibleask.org is a source for christians to ask for questions concerning the bible

2018-05-30 22:41:39 UTC  

from a group of incredibly committed christians

2018-05-30 22:41:40 UTC  

And how are they biased?

2018-05-30 22:41:53 UTC  

Is a christian not allowed to make questions about the bible?

2018-05-30 22:41:59 UTC  

thats not the point

2018-05-30 22:42:02 UTC  

just hold on

2018-05-30 22:42:35 UTC  

the people publishing these answers, especially the original posted article, havent actually posted any kind of concrete evidence just interpretations

2018-05-30 22:42:38 UTC  

guided by their faith

2018-05-30 22:43:01 UTC  

in each of those passages

2018-05-30 22:43:11 UTC  

And what isn't more concrete in their faith than the bible?

2018-05-30 22:43:14 UTC  

you can see that it only referes to the LORD or to some kind of divinity

2018-05-30 22:43:27 UTC  

this is going over your head isnt it

2018-05-30 22:43:34 UTC  

they never refer to jesus in name

2018-05-30 22:43:42 UTC  

And christ is another word for jesus, don't you know? Jesus was often referred to as christ.

2018-05-30 22:43:51 UTC  

they never use the word christ either

2018-05-30 22:44:05 UTC  

Doubt besieges me.

2018-05-30 22:44:18 UTC  

you can doubt whatever you want

2018-05-30 22:44:25 UTC  

we've posted the evidence

2018-05-30 22:44:30 UTC  

the info is out there

2018-05-30 22:44:41 UTC  

if thats still not enough then w/e

2018-05-30 22:44:49 UTC  

And your claims that my source isn't valid are poor at best.

2018-05-30 22:44:56 UTC  

what source?

2018-05-30 22:45:08 UTC  

you havent posted anything at all m8

2018-05-30 22:45:31 UTC  

Nope, instead I just used the source that you posted as evidence against you.

2018-05-30 22:45:43 UTC  

oh the article?

2018-05-30 22:45:53 UTC  

dude you can search up every single one of those bible passages

2018-05-30 22:46:03 UTC  

not a single one of them mentions jesus or christ

2018-05-30 22:46:19 UTC  

Yet is a holy mans interpretation not valid?

2018-05-30 22:46:22 UTC  

the article is making an interpretation of the passages

2018-05-30 22:47:04 UTC  

first off, we have absolutely no evidence that its a priest writting this (whatever you mean by that)

2018-05-30 22:47:18 UTC  

Yet is a holy mans interpretation somehow negligible?

2018-05-30 22:47:43 UTC  

in terms of historical factors such as this, they are yes

2018-05-30 22:48:01 UTC  

because they are too involved with the source matter to give a reliably objective analysis

2018-05-30 22:48:17 UTC  

or do i need to explain that to you too?

2018-05-30 22:48:38 UTC  

So a persons entire lifes work in studying a religious text is negigible>

2018-05-30 22:49:11 UTC  

not necessarily, but in this case yes because he has ulterior motives that drift away from just getting the facts

2018-05-30 22:49:24 UTC  

And what are those?

2018-05-30 22:49:26 UTC  

due to the nature of his position

2018-05-30 22:49:38 UTC  

How so?

2018-05-30 22:49:44 UTC  

wanting to validate his religion?

2018-05-30 22:49:59 UTC  

do i have to explain everything to you>?