international
Discord ID: 308950154222895104
752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 647/7530
| Next
Define corporate
Corporate in the liberal sense, no
Any business interests
No
I was a corporatist as a Strasserist but we have a different definition of "corporation" than most people do. It refers to guild socialism.
Are you for business to be under the correct authority of the socialist state?
I'd probably be in favor of heavily regulated cooperatives with profit sharing
Along with some state heavy industry
All business shall serve the socialist state.
Is this statement correct?
Essentially and they'd be worker owned
They wouldn't be businesses in the capitalist sense
The only "owners" of the state industry would be the head ministers, other than that you'd still have profit sharing
along with smaller "businesses" being less heavily regulated cooperatives
>when the communist believes in market socialism and tries to convert a market socialist to market socialism also without realizing he hates market socialists
I think economy should be heavily centralized, planned and governed by the socialist state.
I don't know who's Jewing who!
@Firefly Heavy industry for sure.
@Deleted User Oy Vey!
@Revolutionary Nationalist In the beginning, for many decades it applies mostly to heavy industry.
True
Why not all industry?
what was the Jew's name?
Erwin?
You might as well go the full mile
@Deleted User Impossible to coordinate properly right away.
@Deleted User I don't give a shit about small business as long as they're cooperativised
@Firefly Honestly that could be said for anything related to economic bureaucracy
With institutions in place, with computing and networking and after long period of preparation it is possible, but not right away.
It is an off-handed remark
@Revolutionary Nationalist how cooperatives are better than central planning?
Because if it's done right they ARE the central planning
The idea of the corporate system is basically syndicatalism, the unions that run the industry are stemming off of the government
So the most the bureaucrats do is manage it
And the union strata work the rest
Or guild rather
@Deleted User You are more business centered than socialist government centered than.
Only proper authority has to have power.
Business must obey.
Business is for the people not people for business.
And if it does not comply it is nationalized.
In the most radical way.
@Firefly Basically what @Deleted User said
What to do with the personal interest of the business which might contradict the interest of the state?
Because after establishing cooperatives in USSR under perestoika it all went to shit due to the business interests.
Cooperatives were undermining Soviet economy for 30 years causing stagnation.
**ANTIFA GENERAL: We are here and will never leave edition**
@Firefly Are you really a fan of antifa?
They have potential. The future.
Right now they are sort of autist.
With the proper authority they evolve.
They have always been autistic.
They are nothing more than SJW's and tools for george soros.
The true antifa is not forgotten yet.
"True antifa"
The true antifa is a tool by george soros.
they're Antifa, they're crazy
and it's not just one group obviously
Even the faggots in rojava are either kikes who were paid by soros or are ex isis terrorists who would gladly massacre civilans.
Antifa will never be more than a group of college pussies who's only goal will be to cause chaos and distress while failing miserably at it.
I can't imagine supporting antifas actions
Imagine having fascists, nazi's, commies and such smashing cars and businesses because they want their stupid little cause to be adopted
It's no way to run a group, no one takes your shit seriously
It's almost like actual communists don't endorse them
yeah, most don't support Antifa
if you want to get your head smashed in by riot police sure, more action
You won't win because it's a laughably small group
are you anti rioting?
yes
oh good
Terror is better when organized, yes?
I'm glad you agree antifa needs more authority and discipline.
Depends on the cause, islamic terrorism maybe
antifa will never get people to agree with them with riots and terror
It is just they act so disorganized. They need organization, right?
they need a new ideology first of all
And leave private property alone
Yes, discipline and authority.
they're already a domestic terrorist organisation in one state and with good reason
what they do is cause chaos for political goals and many times it gets violent
I hope people here see how right-wing laugh at disorganized antifa and look into better organization practices.
what would be those organization practices?
what they're doing is radical and it's a fine line between political violence and terrorism
Antifa are Anarcho-Communists, they're not going to organise
they're only so popular because it's not really taboo to be a part of them
although if you say you're a skinhead that's real fucking taboo
The important part that right-wing encourages us to organize. It is a good thing.
even if you're not political it's taboo
I don't think the right harps on how organized they are, more of who they are behind the mask and how far out their ideas are in a country that is run pretty well all things considered
@Timo))) I mean if scroll up you see people laughing on disorganized antifa. I think the same people won't laugh when we are organized.
the only right that is organised are the cuck-right
they're the type that compromise
and the whole thing is just idpol now
752,937 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 647/7530
| Next