the term is toss your dna into a wood chipper

boomer rage against obama is jutified

<:dumpsterfire:560131482581205052>

That's where we disagree fuguer

I don't side with my people because they're the best, but because they're my people

i want humanity to be the best it can be

not only are u wasting your genetic coding , but then the time and money on said fuckery

https://twitter.com/JFGariepy/status/1188656961082015744

its like you had a win lottery ticket and light it on fire

i want us to be exploring space, not decaying and weakening

omg

Fuguer, calling yourself a eugenicist to justify your multiracial kids

Is cope

amazon needs to act on this

If you were really a eugenicist and really believed that Asians were superior to Europeans, mixing with them would be the OPPOSITE of eugenic

You, sir, are engaging in dysgenics and degrading the Asiatic master race

not really asian meme is all fuckery

rice farmers and shoe makers dont have high iq

<:laughsinfrench:396535844934123523>

china and japan cherry pick hard mode

you dont get it

im 150 iq obviously i dont think im inferior

im much smarter than everyone of all races

you're all africans in comparison

Yikes

5 iq points doesnt mean much

whoops i forgot to be humble and spoke the truth

sorry if it hurts you

A) I press x to doubt and B) I think you underestimate others

<:oof:399031884312739841> when i was higher then your level as a small kid

i have 150iq

<:smugooze:398100987866251265>

im not some pathetic brainlet

<:impotentrage:552803856535257090> im high iq i fuck all of china

You're just a weird egomaniac who exaggerates his exceptional qualities

you fucks

i understand secrets of time and space you could never understand

<:impotentrage:552803856535257090>

No, you do not keke

and you're all about "muh racemixing"

its pathetic

Uh huh

lol you just got pwned your a brainlet

if you think im full of myself come at me with an intellectual discussion

entropy?

<:basedmama:396156349676781569>

abstract algebra

biology?

pick a topic

It's just you using phony principles to justify a fetish and contradicting those principles

your argument that i'd think i was inferior to an asian was just absurd

its like you dont understand statistics at all

But you are

which is crazy because thats the main focus of this channel

COPE

statistics, and biology

<:dab:395562678153904128>

If not intellectually, then culturally and morally

you dont listen

you just expect JF to parrot your talking points

you are not an intellectual

Again with the superiority & inferiority

What

I dont even watch JF LMAO

then get the fuck out

https://twitter.com/JFGariepy/status/1188658534713561088

What is there to watch? Movie reviews

@Leaf Please leave this discord you are not a true fan.

I liked some of his older videos

Oof

i like jf and watch when i can but i call out his bs just like anyone esle

<:JFGOD:439598359628611604>

JF is the only person in my entire life i've found who i agree with 99% of the time

im bluepilled

he has an extremely proficient mind

Imagine identifying as an intellectual

@Dibabliow we vowing burnie to pwn drumpf

and an amazing ability to parse current events and academic pursuits

If it was true fuguer I dont think it'd need to be said

that makes no sense

we live in a society

i love it lol

you identify as something so you can find others like you

@esotericpazuzuism bernie is okay, trump is just another neocon tho

yea but your falled at something even an irish can do

If you're an intelligent person, it should be apparent, not something you need to state explicitly

make more irish

<:mlady:389497741769703424>

Love me or hate me, fact is there is no one like me on youtube right now, before, and even in the future.

I dont dislike you JF

I just am not a fan of the movie reviews lol

Oh I see, so you watch just 97% of my content

lmaooooooo

lol

based

the timing on this was so awesome lol

cucked leaf

i miss beady

based leaf

Bruh 😄

https://youtu.be/VR90gQ-SIaY

beady get banned?

the entire point of zee pooblic speze is that its a place for intellectual discussions

no point of view is off limits for discussion

As well, I dont have free time frequently enough to watch youtube videos on a regular basis

😪 i guess im not a true fan

yes this is a big brain chat <:basedmama:396156349676781569>

no beady changed his name to leaf

@JFGariepy I watch yah brah but make some short pre recorded videos once in a while. like do a video format like Michael Woodley or Edward Dutton

IMPOSSIBLE

<:basedmama:396156349676781569> then defend race mixing

including a point of view that miscegenation is immoral independent of its eugenic or dysgenic effects?

Yeah I'm beady, dashi keeps saying he misses me for some reason

Literally just changed my username lol

i miss beady

leaf is gay canadian catholic

defend tossing your race culture and dna down the Chinese eggroll

<:basedmama:396156349676781569> W I T H S C I E N C E

based

<:supermale:399903458964275203>

the <:CHAD:396569198404435969> Moroccan Muslim vs the <:virgin:396572545610022914> Canadian Catholic

i support ricemixing

evolution is all about selection

Without racemixing

There wouldn't be Finns

🤷

as long as theres selective pressure on humans to be the best, mixing is fine

why do you have an evolution-based ethic?

because all my ethics are based on science and reality

that's ridiculous...

so your fine with letting your daughter get BLACKED

my ethics are based on quantum mechanics and biology

<:soyboy:421747339167006724>

If your relationship preferences were based on eugenic principles alone, you would not have chosen an Asian mate and its dishonest and immoral to advocate widespread racemixing on this phony basis

can you justify your evolution-based ethic?

ivy league star of the harvard football team

**biracial people are only 3% of the population** (in the US) **why should i care?**

no its a moral preference

you cant justify any ethic objectively

I agree

my moral preference is for humans to become as great as possible via evolution

@fuguer ANSWER <:smugooze:398100987866251265>

free of artificial distortions in our natural selection

so why is your position any more legitimate than someone who condemns miscegenation categorically?

Is Murdoch Murdoch <:fbi:418878655822036994> ?

What's great

3% of the population, 72% of bad tv commercials 😄

lol

Also, new MM.

6%

Excluding Hispanics

@fuguer Natural selection is currently selecting for low IQ people & religious people

@fuguer when ling ling brings home jamal... you fine ?<:smugooze:398100987866251265>

answer is... in theory if my kids married a high iq african with flawless behavioral genetics, and in every other way i wouldnt mind. in practice thats almost impossible and even if they did, jews have created a system of racial animus that pits blacks and whites against each other

**latino =/= biracial**

<:oof:399031884312739841>

its a matter of statistics though

LMAO

B L A C K E D

THE MEMES

OH GOD THE MEMES

Ok that's fuged up

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

but you haven't justified why this preference is more legitimate than one against miscegenation?

obviously i dont want my kids marrying blacks

muh jq

just said other wise

or being gay

Why not

no i posed a hypothetic case where i wouldnt object but said it was basically impossible to occur

What if they were highly intelligent, and gay

similar to how an egg could spontaneously unbreak itself, but it won't happen due to entropy

<:kraut:389881471881576448> im on a roll here 2 days of trolling the duck has lead to him to acept his daughter getting blacked

<:laughsinfrench:396535844934123523>

you realize according to physics theres no reason coffee and cream can't unmix, or an egg can't spontaneously unbreak itself

it's just the odds are 10^1000000 to 1

actually i wont even bother explaining it to you

you dont understand the arrow of time or entropy

Are you using quantum physics to justify racemixing?

@fuguer living up to his role in the server.

Does JF know he is in the latest murdoch murdoch?

i base all my moral preferences on the best known scientific facts

including quantum mechanics and biology as i stated before

that's not possible tbh

there has to be a more basic motivating factor

you have to have prior preferences

how can it be impossible for me to construct moral preferences in a way i prefer/

prior values under which to evaluate possible courses of action

https://twitter.com/MENABaddiess/status/1188419900928380928

so it can't be 'based on science'

it has to be based on some fundamental values

yes, and my moral preference for humans to dominate and become the best they can be is likely based on a very base evolutionary drive

what you just said is ridiculous...

okay

that's a real preference

lol

yes, and the other precepts and ideas i use to support that are based on my best understanding of science

hes not wrong thats the underlying drive btwn sexual selection

you can only explain, idk how you 'support' that value

i support basmati rice

with science

in theory if a black person has 120 iq and flawless behavior/social skills, and it was guaranteed their children would be the same, are they even black any more?

you aren't answering the question

its an interesting question

whats the question

to claim that your morality is 'based on science' is ridiculous

you have to have prior values

offspring tend to go towards the mean tho

science can help you evaluate what courses of action best fulfil your desires

you can change your moral principles via recursion

im just start posting bbc memes<:smugooze:398100987866251265>

if my initial drive was to dominate, and i realized science and reasoning was the best hope of that

its not even fair anymore

yes, that's true, but it doesn't make them any more legitimate, just a different context in which preferences form

<:dab:395562678153904128>

then i might recursively evolve my moral beliefs

which most of us do over time

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_of_Canada_(1867–1942)

as we age and grow

at least i hope so

I've never seen an attractive black girl irl

its never going to be 'based on science', though some greater understanding of the world can change the emotional and rational context in which you form values

that's all tbh

whats your proof of that

The current idea of the ruling class is the same as the idea you just suggested btw

To improve humanity as a whole

i dont see how you can make definitive statements about my moral preferences

but you can use science to modify your moral values and "redirect fire"

thats right Rody

Healing the world

Sounds familiar

thats what i mean by recursively evolving your moral beliefs

its a universal quality of values, they are not 'necessary', they are preferred

our preferences arent tabula rasa

theyre born out of our genetics and experiences

I didn't say that they were

and i can shape and redirect my experiences

that's exactly what I said

in a way that shapes my moral preferences

Nerth have you seen Noam Chomsky's latest interview? A lot of Nazi references

i read and studied A LOT of philosophy as a child

yes, studying science can change the emotional and rational context in which you form preferences, that is precisely what I said

i took night classes on philosophy at college when i was still in highs chool

that doesn't mean that they're 'based on science'

ultimately i found most of it meaningless

because it was all circular reasoning based on nothing

@iippo I haven't, but interesting