why do you have an evolution-based ethic?

because all my ethics are based on science and reality

that's ridiculous...

so your fine with letting your daughter get BLACKED

my ethics are based on quantum mechanics and biology

<:soyboy:421747339167006724>

If your relationship preferences were based on eugenic principles alone, you would not have chosen an Asian mate and its dishonest and immoral to advocate widespread racemixing on this phony basis

can you justify your evolution-based ethic?

ivy league star of the harvard football team

**biracial people are only 3% of the population** (in the US) **why should i care?**

no its a moral preference

you cant justify any ethic objectively

I agree

my moral preference is for humans to become as great as possible via evolution

@fuguer ANSWER <:smugooze:398100987866251265>

free of artificial distortions in our natural selection

so why is your position any more legitimate than someone who condemns miscegenation categorically?

Is Murdoch Murdoch <:fbi:418878655822036994> ?

What's great

3% of the population, 72% of bad tv commercials 😄

lol

Also, new MM.

6%

Excluding Hispanics

@fuguer Natural selection is currently selecting for low IQ people & religious people

@fuguer when ling ling brings home jamal... you fine ?<:smugooze:398100987866251265>

answer is... in theory if my kids married a high iq african with flawless behavioral genetics, and in every other way i wouldnt mind. in practice thats almost impossible and even if they did, jews have created a system of racial animus that pits blacks and whites against each other

**latino =/= biracial**

<:oof:399031884312739841>

its a matter of statistics though

LMAO

B L A C K E D

THE MEMES

OH GOD THE MEMES

Ok that's fuged up

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

but you haven't justified why this preference is more legitimate than one against miscegenation?

obviously i dont want my kids marrying blacks

muh jq

just said other wise

or being gay