As well, I dont have free time frequently enough to watch youtube videos on a regular basis

😪 i guess im not a true fan

yes this is a big brain chat <:basedmama:396156349676781569>

no beady changed his name to leaf

@JFGariepy I watch yah brah but make some short pre recorded videos once in a while. like do a video format like Michael Woodley or Edward Dutton

IMPOSSIBLE

<:basedmama:396156349676781569> then defend race mixing

including a point of view that miscegenation is immoral independent of its eugenic or dysgenic effects?

Yeah I'm beady, dashi keeps saying he misses me for some reason

Literally just changed my username lol

i miss beady

leaf is gay canadian catholic

defend tossing your race culture and dna down the Chinese eggroll

<:basedmama:396156349676781569> W I T H S C I E N C E

based

<:supermale:399903458964275203>

the <:CHAD:396569198404435969> Moroccan Muslim vs the <:virgin:396572545610022914> Canadian Catholic

i support ricemixing

evolution is all about selection

Without racemixing

There wouldn't be Finns

🤷

as long as theres selective pressure on humans to be the best, mixing is fine

why do you have an evolution-based ethic?

because all my ethics are based on science and reality

that's ridiculous...

so your fine with letting your daughter get BLACKED

my ethics are based on quantum mechanics and biology

<:soyboy:421747339167006724>

If your relationship preferences were based on eugenic principles alone, you would not have chosen an Asian mate and its dishonest and immoral to advocate widespread racemixing on this phony basis

can you justify your evolution-based ethic?

ivy league star of the harvard football team

**biracial people are only 3% of the population** (in the US) **why should i care?**

no its a moral preference

you cant justify any ethic objectively

I agree

my moral preference is for humans to become as great as possible via evolution

@fuguer ANSWER <:smugooze:398100987866251265>

free of artificial distortions in our natural selection

so why is your position any more legitimate than someone who condemns miscegenation categorically?

Is Murdoch Murdoch <:fbi:418878655822036994> ?