<:oof:399031884312739841>

its a matter of statistics though

LMAO

B L A C K E D

THE MEMES

OH GOD THE MEMES

Ok that's fuged up

<:steflol:561214382181318656>

but you haven't justified why this preference is more legitimate than one against miscegenation?

obviously i dont want my kids marrying blacks

muh jq

just said other wise

or being gay

Why not

no i posed a hypothetic case where i wouldnt object but said it was basically impossible to occur

What if they were highly intelligent, and gay

similar to how an egg could spontaneously unbreak itself, but it won't happen due to entropy

<:kraut:389881471881576448> im on a roll here 2 days of trolling the duck has lead to him to acept his daughter getting blacked

<:laughsinfrench:396535844934123523>

you realize according to physics theres no reason coffee and cream can't unmix, or an egg can't spontaneously unbreak itself

it's just the odds are 10^1000000 to 1

actually i wont even bother explaining it to you

you dont understand the arrow of time or entropy

Are you using quantum physics to justify racemixing?

@fuguer living up to his role in the server.

Does JF know he is in the latest murdoch murdoch?

i base all my moral preferences on the best known scientific facts

including quantum mechanics and biology as i stated before

that's not possible tbh

there has to be a more basic motivating factor

you have to have prior preferences

how can it be impossible for me to construct moral preferences in a way i prefer/

prior values under which to evaluate possible courses of action

https://twitter.com/MENABaddiess/status/1188419900928380928

so it can't be 'based on science'

it has to be based on some fundamental values

yes, and my moral preference for humans to dominate and become the best they can be is likely based on a very base evolutionary drive

what you just said is ridiculous...

okay

that's a real preference

lol