general
Discord ID: 634367565304561675
1,011,369 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 230/4046
| Next
Basically, someone like Hitler derives his power from the people
He moves those people through deep forces, which aren't totally rational.
@Colonel J (The Sheriff) what the fuck is that caption <:tucker:587843675413807106>
And its his continued ability to appeal to those people that grants him continued authority against an ever rising bureaucracy
Whenever such a leader loses that tie to the people, his power diminishes
Just read that caption as well <:tucker:587843675413807106>
@WWM you're talking about cult figures. I wouldnt call hitler a cult leader though
"cult"
Hitler spoke to the archaic portions of the People, as well as the rational side.
He was a master at this.
He called people to *transcendent action*.
And I identify that as religious
Fundamentally
what differentiates a religion from a cult in your opinion.
just asking
the second one looks like my grandad
Those pictures are pretty humanizing
Religions have a formal method of replacing leadership.
so formal vs informal
@vicmaxim usually not a lot
Religions usually have more worked out dogmas
They are more institutionally robust
Cults don't have a method of replacing leadership. They end with the leader.
Where's the gif of that girl giving Adolf her foot?
Yes
Cults tend to be personality centered more solely
Ok now its comming together
some of you will get the basdf last
@TheUserNameofPeace Was Hitler the one with the vision calling the shots, or was he just a mascot used by other people for their vision?
@Trommm Started as the former, ended as the later
At least more towards the later
I read Mein Kampf, and it seemed like all of the ideas came from him. But then I heard Mein Kampf had multiple authors.
The real assurance of leadership is to have the rhetoric and spirito-religious abilities of Hitler in conjunction with a tight personal hold on some form of hydraulic despotism.
Hess didn't add his own content?
I always heard he wrote it in prison
Hess was his cell mate .
Editors usually change works, Trommm, a bit
Normal
Hitler had a lot of tutors so I wouldnt be suprised a lot of his ideas would sound like someone elses
which is why Mein Kampf reads a little chaotically
We all inherit ideas
And then hopefully work from them to something new
We inherit memes as Dawkins says
we are meme replicators
idk
JF balks a bit at that
In his book
lol
@Markomann you can't be a male in the US without dipping into the Latina juice.
Ariel Winter is the only castiza I couldn't resist.
you people stop talking
you go work
There's too many Latinas and they crave white cock, while white women have no pressure to perform. It's genocide.
ty Ban
its saturday dude
nothing to do work for
No, work everyday
Work work work
N
o
Weekends are for NPCs.
if you'r enot working on saturday, and isn't asdf, you need to rethink your lifu
I honest loathe most holidays, weekends etc
That whole notion of dividing up time for pleasures
marko, 4chaners are incels..
fuck off wagie scum
I will never be u
fully
bc i only work part time
Holidays are even worse when they even remove the European aspects of it. So it's just a designated lazy shopping day with a theme.
America is just one massive shopping mall
for literally everything
Halloween? No, Spookytime. Christmas? No, Winter Holidays.
of course, these people are only touching diccs
She lost weight, Ban
By changing her psych meds
Antidepressants cause weight gain in many
Set off hormonal changes
You would not deny her, Marko
whats a hamudi
fake
just fakeness
this isn't a good looking person
yes antidepressants will make you gain weight easy
sexy but not beautiful
easy to get them but you dont want them
antidepressants are for dreamerbulkers confirmed
the extra weight will also make you jolly
id pick cute over sexy any day of the week
sexy is only 1 step from slutty
if ariel winter was a guy
he's be an incel
kinda does look like a femoid version of rodger
Ariel Winter is super rich too
lol
Hollywood bux. Easiest path to super riches around.
I just got mine lol
it's in psychology too
I wish I didnt seem like Im lying right now
That's bad for him
woman dont need to work tho
She probably wants to leave him
Women gaining diplomas in that situation see them as tickets for escape
all women want to leave men
take away the money the status
boom
gone in a second
yep
They are brutal beasts
they dont want to leave men if they have what they want
That's what we aren't taught early enough in gynocentric worlds
That's the only problem
It's the trickery
you give women stability and a good home to raise their kids in and theyre satisfied
If you have a based father he will explain these things to you
And then your entire view of women changes, to your advantage
yeah unfortunately i still dont talk to my dad
if your woman actually cares about being a mom and her kids, shell recognize no other man will love her kids like their father
If you aren't told these things, and all of society pushes against you realizing then, you usually get fucked
youll learn them one way or the other
Well, luckily there's the redpill community
most humans in general dont think
But it's pretty new
women less likely agreed
At most 15 years
That's very recent
And in that early time it was PUA
I bought an early PUA book that helped me some
Probably
I started getting laid often after it
For sure
nothing separates us from animals
what separates us from the animals is animals are stupid
I am smart
r/iamverysmart
incel cope
I'm not prepared to say that, Fug. I will say that *most* people exist as sophisticated animals, near solely.
If there's any area that separates us from animals, spiritually, it's philosophy.
it ahs become true
So if a person is willing to engage in philosophy, I'll give them more credit.
Ive reached that conclusion too
If when you challenge their presuppositions they shut down and repeatedly refuse to engage, I count them as animals.
Basically
Id give christians more credit too if they viewed their religion more as a philosophy than some magical force
jut more incel cope
yes, but you've changed to that
everyone shuts down when you challenge their presuppositions
as a defense mechanism
I am joking btw
i agree i see most people as just sophisticated animals.
@fuguer no
we're not as special as we think we are
Philosopher's don't
Not real ones
They entertain other presuppositions
Other systems
Challenges
etc
Doesn't mean they accept them
But they suspend, bracket, and engage
Yeah but most people arenโt great thinkers
Thereby they can grow unlike most humans
They possess *mind*, in the Aristotelean sense.
A rare faculty amongst the mass.
So, when I'm generous I consider all those to be proto-humans
@WWM can you grow with only a bias forcing you
not the urge to think
what
Can we grow with bias forcing us?
Rather than the positive impetus to think?
yes
not to entertain other thoughts
whatever, I was (mostly) just joking
So, bias being tradition, cultural impositions, etc?
yes
and I say mostly because I believe there is a small amount of cope in there
lol
instinct too
is that a bad thing?
The answer is no.
If that's the *only* thing driving you, no
You will stay in that box
And defend against all comers
But what if it's a really big box tho
But
Actually
because id actually vouch for people having a bias
because it shows they care in a way
that they want to utilize science and not just make more of it
or philosophy
If we think to the early days of the Church, in its confronting Islam, we actually see how the formulations the Church fathers came up with to defend Christian dogma and policy *in the face of Muslim denial of revelation* actually helped lead to the Renaissance.
But
Those Fathers, from a defensive mode for sure, did strive outward towards new thought.
das gud, mang
So you can strive outwards into new thought from a defensive rather than exploratory disposition.
But what if you just innovate your new thought constantly
I know
into something better and better
just be aware of why you're on here
and not other thoughts
I don't quite know what you're asking
Just build on your own bias
and not create new ideas
stay in your box
But, there are other ideas and an, at least mostly, shared reality
Shared problems
Shared feedback
And there's logic
So that's going to lead to intercourse of ideas
And some commonality
Substantial
what if you prohibit them from growing so only yours exist?
would that be a bad thing
if you still grow
and innovate just from your own bias'
and kill everything else
Well, if one idea was to do human sacrifice, suppressing that idea, unless it was necessary for racial survival in extremis, would be pretty certainly good.
So suppression could be good.
In edge cases
But, generally no.
We should have free discourse
Let ideas compete
Right now we are in a situation where the logic, discourse, and levels of correspondence to reality are heavily on the side of the New Right.
Consequently, not being able to compete on the level of ideas, the entrenched Left has silenced these voices.
Because they can't compete
In silencing these voices they speed the destruction of the West and Whites.
Human sacrifice is overrated; at least when people expect me to sacrifice myself; let the plebs die in droves while I just enjoy life <:dab:395562678153904128>
ok but what if we were in power now, would you still vouch for the left's opinions. because I wouldnt
In the coming civil war, we will watch from the sidelines.
+ this is all part of God's plan; if you're having a bad life it's all you deserve ๐
if my ideas reigned
id get rid of all others
and im just being honest
@vicmaxim There's a lot of value in some degree of free discourse
only if it makes my ideas better
I would incline to not totally censor the Left
that's what you gotta do when you're pretending to be a grill
but they're wrong and they're crazy
Perhaps God has a plan to turn our species into a space travelling type 5 civilization ๐
Lmao
You have to think from the perspective of the 'mass individual'
1,011,369 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 230/4046
| Next