You will stay in that box

And defend against all comers

But what if it's a really big box tho

But

Actually

because id actually vouch for people having a bias

because it shows they care in a way

that they want to utilize science and not just make more of it

or philosophy

If we think to the early days of the Church, in its confronting Islam, we actually see how the formulations the Church fathers came up with to defend Christian dogma and policy *in the face of Muslim denial of revelation* actually helped lead to the Renaissance.

But

Those Fathers, from a defensive mode for sure, did strive outward towards new thought.

das gud, mang

So you can strive outwards into new thought from a defensive rather than exploratory disposition.

But what if you just innovate your new thought constantly

I know

into something better and better

just be aware of why you're on here

and not other thoughts

I don't quite know what you're asking

Just build on your own bias

and not create new ideas

stay in your box

But, there are other ideas and an, at least mostly, shared reality

Shared problems

Shared feedback

And there's logic

So that's going to lead to intercourse of ideas

And some commonality

Substantial

what if you prohibit them from growing so only yours exist?

would that be a bad thing

if you still grow

and innovate just from your own bias'

and kill everything else

Well, if one idea was to do human sacrifice, suppressing that idea, unless it was necessary for racial survival in extremis, would be pretty certainly good.

So suppression could be good.

In edge cases

But, generally no.

We should have free discourse

Let ideas compete