Lmfoa

How could you implement distributism

Regulated Capitalism, because anarchocapitalists are anaretarded.

NO ECONOMY

Thoughts on anprims

Based but no redpill

Yes

@everyone Question Of The Day:

How important is a nations military and army? Should all the funding go into it or should it recieve nothing? Why?
(This question is specifically referring to soldiers; not nuclear weapons)

Oh also explain yer fookin answers this time

War is non-existent between civilized countries so there are no need for them to maintain large armies

Disarmament treaties sound lit

shut up LIBTARD

go back to LIBERAL town LOLOLOLOL

We must eviscerate the nonwhites of the world with the most powerful military ever seen, and then expand to the stars

The Military is the most important thing. It should be heavily funded and expanded and then used to conquer.

Agreed.

Yes, we must focus on killing other humans (especially whites) in order to reach "lebensraum" or whatever

A fundamental role of government is services that cannot be gotten more effectively on a well-free market.

^

European countries really need to maintain a gigantic military with all the wars going on there

Nationalised services are good but private companies exceed in other areas over the government

Daring today aren't we

There's no wars currently taking place in Europe

I'm also completely against the current state of the EU and if they gained an army then it will almost certainly go to their heads

@GlobalDelete yes. Why not?

Fuck foreigners

Probably because there are no wars going on in Europe

So?

Start a war!

To who's benefit?

A large military would give us the initiative

@GlobalDelete my people's

"my people's"

Would you want to be drafted into this army @The Desert Fox V

yeah drafting the people and sending them out in hellish conditions sure seem like benefitting them

@sandwitch I'd volunteer

<:really:591181753625083905>

War is only to the benefit the rich elite

^

Wow you'd volunteer

Congrats

What about the other millions of peoples in your nation that don't want to go out in war?

You do have to make it through training as well you know

^

Playing Call of Duty isn't the same as being a soldier

hahahhaha lopl rekt

They don't grade people on how many carbs they can gain in a day

^

Fighting africans isn't difficult. Gaining land benefits many generations compared to the cost of one suffering.

Wow you kill millions of white citizens of your own country in order to gain some sand

"but muh oil"

Right so they fight for more land which means a governments money has to be spread out even more which means less money spent in the people who fought for that land?

And it doesn't benefit the rich elite?

Millions wouldn't die in an african campaign

Really

Millions have died in afghanistan and the middle east

I've heard they've recently sharpened all their spears

Those countries are better at quick fire guerilla warfare unlike the USA and the rest who like it all that methodically thought out

The difference between the isis countries and north africa is that north africa is pretty rich with way bigger militaries than the middle easterners

The solution to a guerilla war is simple: concentration camps. You just need the will to do that.

Also the conquering government would gain new streams of revenue which it would use for the people.

The main gain is land though.

Not worth the cost of the sanctions from counties with morals lol

I doubt that'd happen. If done humanely it's hardly immoral.

It isn't immoral at all.

Worked in the Boer war fine and this time we have the tech to avoid deaths from disease etc.

What do you propose making five star hotels for the people you just invaded?

I thought you wanted the money going into the mainland not maintaing the land and lives of the people that hate your fucking guts

Either way good idea Rommel come back to me when it works properly

<:luv:591451841045463041> <:luv:591451841045463041>

A 5 star hotel? More like a bunch of tents surrounded by electric fences. We can even force rhe males to work.

@sandwitch

Could make the houses out of shipping containers

Yknow keep two families in there

@The Desert Fox V

Sure why not

As long as they don't die of exposure one could probably convince the UN it's fine

@sandwitch

I think the best system is having a set number of people enter the country and they join a government workforce along with the homeless, unemployed, etc

They work on creating roads, planting trees, create parts for military weapons, etc and intern they are given hospitality, money, healthcare, citizenship, education, etc
They stay in shipping containers which can facilitate a family of four. Families can pay for plugs, televisions, chairs and other convinces if they work and then pay for them.

After they pass a general knowledge test(s), know how to speak English to an acceptable standard, have at least one skill that they can take into society like plumbing, etc and at least 3 years in the workforce they will be given the option to leave the workforce and make it on their own

@The Desert Fox V

It sets them up for life in a new country, it gives them a safe environment to integrate into, it teaches them useful skills which they can take into society like electricians, plumbers, etc

Not to mention it can be used to provide people who are homeless, unemployed, etc an outlet to get them back on their feet

(this is for immigration by the way)

But I don't want them to integrate. I want my people, the conquerors to rule over the conquered. But having hobos+unemployed do work is fine

I'm scrapping the imperialism part this is just normal immigration of people who want to enter (in my case) the UK

But education should be available to anybody above the age of 21 because we're living in a world where people will lose jobs because robots can do it better and they'll need to have an outlet to find a new job and that is the solution

Britain for the British

No immigration

@sandwitch

We owned 1/3 of the world at one point so technically first generation immigrants where British citizens

<:hyperthink:591182142189338655> <:hyperthink:591182142189338655>

No

Natives didn't have citizenship

Also, for those that did I would revoke it because they shouldn't have it

@sandwitch

Are you British?

Yes

Ah hello fellow Britbong

So you support immigration? @sandwitch

I believe they are an integral part of the workforce

Are *you* an immigrant?

But I think we should cut down on the amount of people who enter the country tho

No

Why are they integral to the workforce? What can they do which cannot be done by natives?

They do the jobs we don't want to

Like what? There are plenty of unemployed whites who should have jobs. And I value unity over some petty decision not to do a job

I agree we should cut down on benefits to encourage people to work. We should also focus on having the Brits become nurses, doctors, etc because right now a worrying amount of our NHS has roots in foreign nations

Right I've got to go but I'll try to get on later

The NHS should be made free of foreigners by "getting rid of" the foreigners.

Cutting down on benefits isn't necessary. Just give benefits only to people searching for jobs, and whip people who abuse the system.

@sandwitch

All I know is that the people should have right to everything the government has access to

If they have citizenship

I'm talking about everyone around the world

Fuck the bot

A strong military is essential to having a strong and sovereign nation, we need to give them as much funding as they need so long as it's not wasted

As a person born to immigrants who came to America legally, we believe that immigration should be limited.

The government can exploit people from other countries so they can pay them less and in turn save more money

Any native to their land is fully able to do any jobs

"America" should ban all immigration that is non-european @Erturion

And very easy entry into US for european immigrants

You deserve to be replaced

Europeans are by far the most hard working

I’d suggest putting Asians into the allowing of immigration

They’re pretty hardworking

I agree

Ngl asian and white mixed are cute

Asians and whites

@Asdrubal you know that breaks rule #7 right?

That's a call to genocide after all

Hey I never said white people

I just said you deserved to be replaced

It was immediately after Maksim posted a comment, to my knowledge Maksim is White, so that's advocating for White genocide

I never said that he should be killed or whites in general

And even then, saying someone deserves to be replaced is a call for that group of people to be genocided according to the UN definition

Yes but I never implied replacement with force

And if you believe the UN

Doesn't specify it has to be with force

Never implied any of those

You're a white Supremacist, you should know how dog whistles work

"you deserve to be replaced" implies the reduction of the birthrate among one group

White birthrates are naturally declining

I'm not saying we should impose measures to stop white births

Doesn't matter to the argument right now

Whites are naturally being replaced?

Saying that one deserves it means that you're advocating for it

By that logic alot of the people have broken rule 7

I could say that I deserve a raise and therefore be advocating for my employer to increase my pay by X amount for Y reason

In this case Y doesn't matter, X does and by saying that someone deserves something means you are advocating for that thing. Whether or not it's good or bad is a different discussion

Right now that doesn't matter to me because that's not the point of the discussion

You are using that logic to say I violated rule #7, correct? Therefore, that would mean almost everyone has, meaning the lack of enforcement of rule #7 means it doesnt matter.

Boo hoo I hurt your feelings by saying "You deserve to be replaced"

Dont try and be a smartass about it

Trust me, if I had permission I'd enforce Rule 7 every time

Probably when it works in your favor

But you know when someone says the US government deserves to suffer or someshit like that you wont care

Why in the fuck should I care about what happens to an alien?

"Dont advocate for genocide"

The US government consist of 4 million people in total

That's kind of genocidal

Dont you think?

The abstract notion of the US government doesn't matter. Politicians and office workers are replaceable, federal buildings are rebuildable

Yes but you are advocating the death of 4 million people

Didn't know that US government officials were a sepeate and distinct race. Can you show me where they are?

Even if I were it wouldn't be for all of them, just the ones who actively committed treason

"acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such"

Those 4 million would fall into the national category

National would be members of a nation

It’s not specifically a national group

Ilhan Omar is not Part of „Nation“ of U.S.A. as much as you can call it one

Where the fuck did you get that from when relating to the government

*a large body of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory.*

How is government officials who did something bad related to ^

Just saying "All those in the US government deserves to suffer" is a call to genocide

>Didn't know that US government officials were a sepeate and distinct race.

yeah they're called kikes

That’s not a call to genocide

Wanting to murder 4 million people is kind of genocidal ngl

Use the „calls to violence“ side

Then you have a case

„Calls to genocide“ government members is a lot more defensible

As in, that is not in fact a call to genocide

Advocating for the death of 4 million people is genocidal

That really cant be dismissed as violence

They’re under same rule

It's mass homicide, not genocide

It’s a call to violence

Ye

muh violence is bad

Rule 7

pussy rule

Do you want this place banned?

>o-oh no please dont kill my server, i have a constitution and everything

its just a discord server bro

@Tacilus they're pissed cause I said "they deserve to be replaced"

We had this place banned before

cool story

Go to a neonazi server if you want to act like an idiot

how is not caring about an inconsequential discord server being an idiot

How is allowing things that would get it banned not being an idiot

cause it leads to reddit-tier autism

>d-d-dont ban us, we're good goys

Uwu

oh lol you're a communist

big think

And you’re a natsoc

indeed

What happened last time you guys tried to take commie clay

Lots of dead krauts

communism is fucking retarded though

How much communist literature did you read

"Yeah Ive read nothing Marx wrote"

marx's drivel was written up in some office completely disconnected from reality

"But I've listened to clearly fascist bias media about him and memes and they say he's retarded so I dont care libtard"

communism is based upon the notion that all men are created equal, no?

Even funnier when people conflate leftists and liberals

i mean they're all gay

*oh my god he sounds so bluepilled* @Notso

One can be a leftist and not a liberal, or a liberal and not a leftist

Also

*hasnt read even the wiki page*

Saying they’re gay doesn’t mean anything

**Atleast**

**Read the wiki**

^

Marx and Engels actually specified they are not egalitarians

Marx and Engels were fucking based

Because they think the term is meaningless

Marx and Engels were communist degenerates

Egalitarian Marxism is called Scientific Marxism I think

I’d barely call Marx degenerate

People like him were more „trad“ than most

And

I mean he wasn't the modern sodomite, but still

Quotes like that are proof Marxism isn’t synonymous with modern liberalism lol

Marx was fucking based when it came to the right to bare arms

Communism, in the end, is not a single social ideal

It’s an economic and political system

Marx was a direct ideological descendent of Adam Smith and John Locke

Very very cringe

Like capitalism has been so great lol

You can have Great Leap Forward/Great Purge
You can have hardline liberals who want to fight for „justice“

Both claim to act under Marx‘s guidance

The first group is more marxist then the second tbh

Well "the dialectic" isn't exactly a moral compass. It's a power analysis

I agree it is more Marxist

Modern China is trying to use it

Forcibly industrializing a rural country like China and Russia

That is a success of communism