^

Playing Call of Duty isn't the same as being a soldier

hahahhaha lopl rekt

They don't grade people on how many carbs they can gain in a day

^

Fighting africans isn't difficult. Gaining land benefits many generations compared to the cost of one suffering.

Wow you kill millions of white citizens of your own country in order to gain some sand

"but muh oil"

Right so they fight for more land which means a governments money has to be spread out even more which means less money spent in the people who fought for that land?

And it doesn't benefit the rich elite?

Millions wouldn't die in an african campaign

Really

Millions have died in afghanistan and the middle east

I've heard they've recently sharpened all their spears

Those countries are better at quick fire guerilla warfare unlike the USA and the rest who like it all that methodically thought out

The difference between the isis countries and north africa is that north africa is pretty rich with way bigger militaries than the middle easterners

The solution to a guerilla war is simple: concentration camps. You just need the will to do that.

Also the conquering government would gain new streams of revenue which it would use for the people.

The main gain is land though.

Not worth the cost of the sanctions from counties with morals lol

I doubt that'd happen. If done humanely it's hardly immoral.

It isn't immoral at all.

Worked in the Boer war fine and this time we have the tech to avoid deaths from disease etc.

What do you propose making five star hotels for the people you just invaded?

I thought you wanted the money going into the mainland not maintaing the land and lives of the people that hate your fucking guts

Either way good idea Rommel come back to me when it works properly

<:luv:591451841045463041> <:luv:591451841045463041>

A 5 star hotel? More like a bunch of tents surrounded by electric fences. We can even force rhe males to work.

@sandwitch

Could make the houses out of shipping containers

Yknow keep two families in there

@The Desert Fox V

Sure why not

As long as they don't die of exposure one could probably convince the UN it's fine

@sandwitch

I think the best system is having a set number of people enter the country and they join a government workforce along with the homeless, unemployed, etc

They work on creating roads, planting trees, create parts for military weapons, etc and intern they are given hospitality, money, healthcare, citizenship, education, etc
They stay in shipping containers which can facilitate a family of four. Families can pay for plugs, televisions, chairs and other convinces if they work and then pay for them.

After they pass a general knowledge test(s), know how to speak English to an acceptable standard, have at least one skill that they can take into society like plumbing, etc and at least 3 years in the workforce they will be given the option to leave the workforce and make it on their own

@The Desert Fox V

It sets them up for life in a new country, it gives them a safe environment to integrate into, it teaches them useful skills which they can take into society like electricians, plumbers, etc

Not to mention it can be used to provide people who are homeless, unemployed, etc an outlet to get them back on their feet

(this is for immigration by the way)

But I don't want them to integrate. I want my people, the conquerors to rule over the conquered. But having hobos+unemployed do work is fine