you dont have to play modern games

my dick

literally

go buy

a 90s gme

on the cheap

@Lucienne d'Anwyl the problem with letting people sell blood is that it adds an incentive that isn’t purely noble. You’ll get *more* blood if you let people sell it, sure, but you’ll also get aids blood and hepB blood.

Also, Tool is of the 90s.

90s was literally the corporate uprising

because depreciation

and then play it

i said nothing bout games

@Scale_e you test the blood

@Scale_e why tf would you stop testing people

blood drives already get infected blood

it isnt like making it voluntary magically stops stuff

MAnimal is too much of a serious MAN to play vidya

blood drives dont work on the honor system lmao

he scoffs at our plebian entertainment

It does here in Australia.

thats retarded

thats retarded lol

And we have the cleanest blood supply in the world.

you ahve gay people in australia right?

australia loses another point on the world developmental index

Australia is lost; abandon Island

literally the honor system can never work

because gay men eist

exist

first for the emus, then for the guns, now for this

lol true luci

and even with an honor system

many people dont know they have aids

or other disease

That gun buyback thing... poor Australia is doomed from that.

its not like the symptoms are immediately apparent

neat

Australia will be a Chinese protectorate in 50 years time anyway. Who cares?

lol

That and Australia is plagued by Dingos and FemiNazis

good think im learning chink ;)(

I've been marked

not sure what is more invasive

We have a form to fill out before you donate. “Have you ever had, even once, male to male sexual relations” is like one of the first questions.
There is no reason to lie, because blood donations here are purely voluntary and unpaid.

I care because losing territory to the Chinese does not bode well.

There is no incentive other than wanting to help.

gay men want to help too\

the chinks are comin for yer land breh

of course they cause most of the problems but still

@juryrigging can you at least correct the english on this thing

China is already in charge

theyre gonna develop it like in africa

Actually that's on donation forms in the US, too.

China will fall apart

They are like the David Icke Lizzard people

the us still tests its blood

and everyone hates gay donators

And it’s made clear to them that they aren’t helping if they have that cheeky cock in bum fun.

And by donation I mean selling the blood to an authorized corporation.

US will fall apart first

please

damn

China doesn't need capitalism

we d o

@Henry Dorsett Case wasn't me who did it, but sure 😛

US isnt even slightly close to falling apart

😳

didn't say they were

no country is particularly close to falling apart

Whereas China is

no...

no country has rampant nationwide outbreaks of violence

Yes

that is silly

chinese people are meek lol

just plain silly

but, if things turnn south we will be trying to kill eachc othe

r

they arent anywhere near a tipping point

We have been in an economic war for 10 yrs

china is doing surprisingly well for themselves

we aren't winning that war

especialy now that theyve begun to deal with the muslim infestation

Authoritarian regimes simply need flashpoints for widespread unrest to start

fine if a works 😔

Hong Kong is getting there

theyve had plenty of flashpoints

which accomplished nothing

could remove the a

No

hing kong is culturally isolated

https://www.donateblood.com.au/eligibility/blood-testing-and-safety

no real chinese person cares about someone from hong kong

Yes it is

But

@Henry Dorsett Case Sorry there's a character limit for changing peoples names of 32. If you have a better suggestion for a 32 character name that means: I'm on my last warning for mic spam, feel free to suggest them

they could have an open revolt

theyd be crushed

and regular chinese wouldnt care

It can still easily spread from there

No it wouldnt

We have the cleanest blood supply in the world because it’s not paid for.

Because foreign intervention

foreigners dont intervene whennthe chinks murder tibetans

That's diff

they killed every child in a generation and got away with it, they could easislly say tommorrow, no more capitalism and watch the west struggle to find new suppliers

why would they intervene for citizens of hong kong

@Comando I just mean take the a out it sounds better if problem: ?report @me reason

The Chinese seem pretty docile, though.

they are

they are a slave race

chinese people aren't gonna 'rise up'

functionally

their religion is that of a slave race

Cooltic, you're way too confident in your own ideological presuppositions. People in China are not brought up in a Liberal society. They will not react to stuff like Mutts would. Plus, even if they were like that, revolutions are born of notable and unexpected hits to quality of life, not of ideals.

Like the flashpoint would have to be something huge.

their values and culture that of a slave race

they are content in their position

they dont mind oppression

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM people in HK are

Silly

Don’t rock the boat.

HK is tiny and doesn;t matter

in the grand scheme of things

And what ideological suppositions?

HK is extremely important to China lelwat

HK was run by the UK for a few generations. Their culture is different now.

WEEEEEEE THANKS

the party controls that country. they think long term. we can't think till next week

I honestly dunno what level would wake up the Chinese to overthrow their rulers.

The US can only think 4 years ahead.

very easy to sow dissent and pad the pockets of western politicians

This is not quite true

but to some degree it unfortunatley is true

The lingering depression builds up and breaks out eventually

Even for docile peoples

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2ej2BFBCbo

and they are sitting on an untold amount of USD

it really depends how bad it gets

dude

More a function of time

ppl don;t just revold every time there is a depression. lol

Not just intensity

One would hope.. but the spirit mighta been bred out of them.

they never had spirit to begin with

are you aware of their famous philosophies?

Yes they did.. at least in ancient history.

Historically, even those kinds of people can rise up

one and all devised to keep the peasants in line

If they start starving, and dying in the millions, they may, *may* overthrow their government.
But they’ll just replace it with yet another form of despotism that promises bread.

just hoading the USD, waiting to the day when they flood the market with all that inflation from 20 yrs of quantive easing

you think confuscianist chinks were anything other than a slave to their nobles?

theyve always been like that

Not in a *timely* manner

content to lay down and be kicked

But eventually

We have a much smaller world tho

And exposure to other cultures

they can but won't

@Scale_e Mao's Plans say that widescale starvation isn't enough.

So the time required will likely be accelerated

@Laucivol Mao was wrong.... about a lot of things.

@Laucivol only peasants died under mao

if the urbanite chinks died en masse

theyd change their tune

communist gov is playing both sides against each other; creates a limited affluent class to use western capitalism to fund their develoipment whille leving the rest as peasants

Which is the group that needs to rebel - the peasants.

No.

most of chinas population is urbanite tho

then when world economy tanks (always does), they turn to peasants and go < "see. capitalism bad. communism good"

A common "problem" with westerners is that you seem to think that Liberalism must always produce the best outcomes by definition (at least long term). You literally have no clue how to even begin to deal with a system that isn;t like your own, but it still works, and perhaps even beats yours in some ways.

^^

The group that needs to rebel in China is - high level party members who think they can get ahead by whipping up a starving people into a frenzy.
Then you get your overthrow.
...straight into another kind of despotism.

they won't

someone told me that blacks commit more crime cuz of economic discrimination.. then i said well.. how about the rape

despotism isnt a bad thing

<:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

sexual discrimination

checkmate

50%+ of rape is done by 13% of the population... but its cuz of socio-economics

<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>

Your belief in rationalism would dictate you'd have to adopt the nu system, but you actually BELIEVE in Liberalism (despite how much you pretend to be atheistic) so you cannot do that. And thus you short-circuit...

Those in the East don't think like Westerners. They aren't rasied to value individualism. they value the group first and have a duty to that group

@UnScottable *socio economics

You need the monies to get the honeys.
They got no monies, they rape your honeys.

...is the logic they’ll throw back at you to defend, yes, even rape, if it’s tinged with *gasp* racism!

<:thinkcide2:462282425486147585>

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM WTF are you saying?

Doom is right about Liberalists not being able to fathom those that don't operate nor view the world like they do

You end up saying that China totally will collapse any day. For 50 years. Non stop. Any day now.

it's why the Left has controlled them for so long

are you saying socialism is better?

no

never

Nope

I'm saying westerners (not only westerners ofc, but in this case that is the topic) are very close minded

i am saying that from a strategy perspective, communism is like a military hiearchy

because they think they are the opposite

Dissenter Browser... 😩 👌

and cannot fathom their own limitations, because they are sure they rejected them

but that is just impossible

and remember groups effect change more than individuals

divide and conquer

easy to diviide westerners

not so much those in the eAst

groups are less effective than a smart individual

negative

The east has always done nationalism better than the west.
China’s communism, Japan’s military authoritarianism, it’s all based on national identity supplanting individual identity.

even smart individuals need to be put in charge of teams to get things done

meritocracy

There's also the problem of dismissing fundamental differences between persons as an ideological doctrine. The same political system may very well work VERY differently in different cultures/among different populations. Ppl are NOT the same.

Yes but an individual can become independant of said group and still be effective

'nationalism' doesn't mean indiividualism though

not in comparson he can't

>he

Whatever\

look

Though that shortcoming is not inherent to Liberalism, it's more of a dumbass take on Liberalism that leads to that.

especially not without the great equalizer; the market

A group is effective

in a very limited way

true Doom

they typically tend o be good at doing one thing

very well

you have that backwards

but an individual can be effective in more ways because they don't need to hyper focus to be effective

if you don't have hyperfocus in a group

the group splinters

look at the left for example

the individual needs support from others. if the group is obstructionist, the individual is powerless

This is not a dychotomy though...

too many different ideas

You are both an individual and a part of a group

true

both of these are essntial to your personhood

The individual can subvert the group

hence the obsructionist

control their narrativ

and bypass the obtructionism

to what effect?

only themselves

To get what they want done

why else bypass obstructionism

how? an individual cannot generate the same output a a group

You're just arguing for anarchy

it's pointless

even at low efficiency

No

the group wins

the group can be more effective

but only if they have hyper focus