voulí_politics_discussion
Discord ID: 613770471938195467
8,103 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/82
| Next
Well first.
Well second.
WAT
Who deleted all the history
Wai
<:hyperthink:462282519883284480>
@Miniature Menace It's such an obvious fed, too
just from looking at the tweets
looks like they (the feds) might be testing some sort of bot on the account TBH
I wonder if Tay tried to get back online
She was a full blown nazi shitposting machine
There's a fascinating trend of AI behaving like radical right wing extremists when fed unfiltered data online. Perhaps this is the reason why places like /pol/ exist and are full of autistic radical fashy-bois, because their autism predisposes them to think in the same mechanical heuristic models.
Hypothesis: Unfiltered data + systematic cold logic = Neon Nazi
This is even replicated in the tools used to efficiently deploy police forces, as they often suggest that resources be deployed mostly to black neighborhoods.
I really have to wonder, is there like, some ironic context to this, or is this now just straight up propaganda?
What the living shit is this
Roses are red
Doves are a creature
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1164250858026147840
um
Wat
The simpsons thing was so cringey it's not even funny
What was that
Is this some kind of fever dream
Those were my exact thoughts
it was like some kind of weird fever dream
@Miniature Menace Autism + Robot = Neo-Nazi?
<:Nice:595347902155718666>
that picture of people with red eye helmets - that's cosplay
cosplay or it may actually be some of the actors on set posing for a promo photo. they're from jin-roh (the wolf brigade), it was an anime they made a live action film last year
the red eye dudes are actually there to fight violent radical suicide bombers, the film changed the story quite a bit and spoiled the ending. the anime ending is fucking rough
Hahaha enough do
That's the point of mainstream opinion
#NotAll
That's the exact reason why we have the certain laws we do. Because enough people agree with them or rather more exactly most people are complicit in their application
Most people be like well shouldn't of broken the law then
Because most people are idiots
Most people willingly tether their mouths to the arseholes of whoever can feed them the nicest tasting shit.
Most people feel entitled to their dog shit opinions just because it's more acceptable to have one than have none or one that's unpalatable.
I'd love to know what the people at Spiked mags reaction is when they see that most of the comments on their videos are from hard nationalist criticising them on their pussy diversity bullshit
Like they get very few comments anyway so it's nearly all just people disagreeing with their stance.
To which I am generally one of them
I'll listen to their podcast for the news and the ol point about listening to opposite voices as it were but I'll always find time to comment DEPORT ON MASS if they give some lukewarm nonsense on immigration, Islam, etc
was that simpsons cut real? doesn't seem to have the same production value and voiceover quality as the simpsons i remember
but that was like 15years ago
There are even some Muslims who don't want mass immigration from Muslim countries because they know their new home will turn into a shithole
Idea: if gun ownership is a right, and schooling up to middle school is universally mandatory, then we should have public gun training for all high schoolers
make it part of senior year, when most students are finally turning 18
if everyone has the training which people want to make mandatory to receive a gun, why not train in school, and we won't need our rights to be stripped away.
all the same easy access to guns, just increase public awareness, just like how teen pregnancy is avoided by actually teaching them in sex ed
nowhere did we ever have to mention that people have the right to bear children, yet so many do it accidentally, and we have the solution to accidents: education, not forbidding.
we did gun safety (to include actually shooting shotguns) in 8th-grade Safety Ed
though, this is also (a) the late 80's, and (b) in a place where the 1st day of buck season is literally a state holiday
I thought schools were for indoctrination <:smugon:512048583806025739>
Schools are for Indoctrinating the Weak and Shooting the Strong <:TimeToBarn:590594455657119812> <:GetDownOnTheBarn:590619824640753697>
depending on how you want to parse that, that could very well mean "shooting is for indoctrinating the strong"
i approve
How would you describe China social credit system. I guess like literal social capital? I was going to say that the Chinese were using it to actually eliminate the need for money but then realised it's just another for of capital in and of itself.
Plus you need to actually work to get what you earn still. So it's not Marx's NEET fantasy world.
https://twitter.com/khxn100/status/1163612912197480449 how many are surprised by this
my guess fucking zero
like this was because lefty cunts, out of touch politicians and Muslims who have called for the silencing of those who criticise islam. Well done the left YOU FUCKING RAPY, DEGENERATE COCKS
all of the 3 groups i mentioned can fuck off
what. phisically attacking someone and taking off their clothing is an obvious no, why are you defending their behaviour?
dont go blame other people for their behaviour
fucking hell
am not, am point out how this was going to happen if western leader didn't have the balls to say islam is a problem
so? how is that their problem? they dont think 'Islam' is a problem and are not responsible for this type of shit
i was saying if politicians open the flood gates and let the third world in then they silence those who disagree, you will get a violent backlash
look there are plenty of people frustrated at western leaders response to the threat that islam poses and if you again silence those who bat a eye as to the problems it brings you will end up with violence
as far as i understand, almost all European states have anti-migration or anti-muslim parties. They are not silenced, they just dont form a majority. I think that actions like this will only have negative effects onthe willingness of people to consider the points that these parties make.
>they are not silenced
lmaooooo
when they're not outright being banned like in belgium and finland they're still facing a menagerie of barriers imposed on them by the ruling class
look the more government ignore the problems with islam the more people will be compelled to go out and do something like that seen in the video. as well anti Islamic sentiment is growing i mean look at Birmingham is barely a English city and people who are native to Birmmigham are leaving in droves
or lets take London not even slightly British or English
That is correct
People in glass houses
Don't worry, you'll be the ones suffering.
Not us.
Lol
@Αγωνιζῆς @tea_in_space I highly doubt this is as a result of Western leaders not speaking up about the problems of Islam
I think it's more-so a problem of people being fed-up with the problems that Islam has been causing in Europe, and being pushed to a breaking-point (thankfully they didn't harm the two Muslims). I suppose that the only way to minimize such incidents like this (which are kinda retarded on the part of the victimizers--god, that word has become such a buzzword in the last few years--since those female Muslims likely haven't done any harm to anybody), it should be shown that not ALL Muslims are like those causing terrorism (Yes, I'm unironically saying that #NotAllMuslims), and for their politicians to find some sort of way to minimize the islamic terrorism (by making the immigration system more strict).
And while it's kinda understandable WHY countries might want to ban the burka (though the reasoning for that AFAIK seems to fit more as a reason to ban the niqab, which hides more of the individuals appearance than the burka), but I'm **kinda** opposed to the banning of the burka, because It's kinda hard to hide someone's identity while in a burka. Likewise, I'm kinda opposed to banning the niqab, however.....I do believe that those who wear the Niqab should have to show their face for identification (Voter ID, etc), regardless of their backwards goat-fucking beliefs. As a deterrent to make sure they DO show identification, I think that light fines should occur should they refuse to show their face to identify themselves (in the range of $100-$500 per refusal, with each refusal causing a doubling of the fine, and possibly up to a week in jail after, say....5 refusals).
One looks like Richard Spencer's less gay brother, the other looks like he's a member of the Welsh Mafia
Immigration quotas are needed in the US. We need to only allow a small number of immigrants from third world countries and more from European. And ones that do come from third world countries must be placed under a government program where they must assimilate or leave.
If immigration quotas are not put in place, the demographics of the US will change and statistically the US will vote more left leaning. Basically the republicans will never win again.
Yeah that was planned bucko
the only solution i see to fixing the problems with islam in the UK is to pay most of the Muslims here to leave
No, on the banana boats lad
because i mean even if half the problems with Islam did not exist we still have the other problem which is Muslims have a fuck ton of kids so over time the nation will become majority Islamic. we have seen through out history once Islam is introduced into a society it normally becomes dominant in the society
8,103 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/82
| Next