voulí_politics_discussion
Discord ID: 613770471938195467
8,103 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/82
| Next
Its not only islam
This is about demographics
yeah i mean look at Brimmigham its barely English, the situation is getting worse i think more Muslims will get attacked by non - Muslims unless something changes
You're delineating purely along muslim and non-muslim
You said it; English
yeah i was also trying to get at the fact its also a demographical issue to
There are two ways to deal with that
or a combination of both techniques
like its not just islam but its also the fact that if we continue along with this trend the native English will become the minority
Yes
Are you in England mate?
yep
How would you describe yourself politically?
@SPOOKY Phil, Ruler of Heck I dont think this is a result of that either, as too the solution to this, as far as i know immigration to the Eu is already very restrictive. I dont really see how it could become even more closed to be honest.
>
well if we are talking about a governmental system i would say am a monarchist but i consider myself a socially a classical liberal
>Hundreds of thousands immigrating to the isles
Would you not say youre more nationalist?
oh yeah am also a nationalist
As to the ban on face veils, my country has recently implented a full ban on such covers. And though i was very conflicted about it, I now reluctanly support such a ban in the public space, government buildings, public transit etc.
I still think its a difficult choise
It required me to ask some hard questions about what i value more
@tea_in_space are you available to VC for like 5 mins
i think there should be a ban on face veils because such clothing like the burka for example should not be normalised
sorry mate but no i might be able to later @Lêohte
Secularism is big gay IMO
Alright fella
i think there needs to be a balance between secularism and religion so the best way to do so is a monarchy (depending on were it is)
The monarchy has been inextricably linked to a denomination of Christianity
Thats its moral backbone
Power ordained by the creator
I'm not sure how it would be framed otherwise (Monarchy)
Atheists are soulless creatures
well ignore what i just said then
@Quicksilver053 It's too late for that
The US is already on an irreversible track
The only solution is secession
I always believe it's never too late to come back. I just don't know if other people can see that.
Ford is a faggot who follows retards like Stefan Molyneux
ofc he's gonna be edgy and pretend like that makes him "red-pilled"
Gotta pray that gay away <:smugay:593502151758708776>
well, at least he's addressing it
so let's see how he does
iVe aLwAyS sAiD a CoNvErSaTiOn Is tHe ApPrOpRiAtE wAy To dEaL wItH cOnTrOvErSiAl CoMmEnTs
Sure, buddy.
>caving to pressure from *Reset Era* of all places
@Wizard_of_The_West Depends on what's the goal
What @Quicksilver053 said was to maintain a White Super-majority in the US
Which is near impossible given the current trajectory we're in
At least without taking some drastic steps, which also seems near impossible
In any case, a Civil War is inevitable
The rule of what war *is* is even in flux at the moment.. who's to say we're not in such a struggle at the moment.
The drastic measure would basically be "just close the border, feget"
most of the increase in non-white population is due to immigration, rather than long term births
birth rates of new arrivals tend to decline after a couple generations
The only candidate which even has policies addressing such concerns is Augustus Sol Invictus, who is running for 2020 Republican Candidacy
A few of his campaign policies include
1) Ending the Federal Reserve
2) Building a complete southern wall in the first 100 days
3) Breaking up Silicon Valley
4) Repealing the Hart Celler Immigration Act of 1965 and replacing it with 1790 Naturalization Act (Only free white people of good character may become citizens)
and the highest native birth rates long term, are from conservative whites, iirc
don't close the border, open it to europeans :^)
And the chance of him getting anywhere near any sort of power in the current status quo is 0.00000001%
why would I want to flood the US with europeans who let anti-white policies win in europe, and then had the gall to flee from it, instead of fighting it?
Define "Europeans" at this time. XD
i mean american whites also "let" anti-white policies win in america
augustus is controlled opposition, even if he himself doesn't know it
also european immigrants would probably come moreso from eastern europe
he's bankrolled by the same dude who pushed the charlottesville clusterfuck
I don't really want the the american whites who let anti-white policies win in america to be here either, but they already are. And it's a better ratio than adding even *more* of them.
We would need a pretty selective filter for what kind of europeans will be allowed if we do this.
what do you mean
you're one of them
I'm thinking a generation cool down is what's needed.
And it can't only select for those with the balls to defend america from demographic replacement, but also for some of the values which already were selected for in americans by prior generations, otherwise we're just planting the seeds for future political strife.
"Look, we're just closing immigration into the US for 50 years. Deal with it."
That's probably closer to the best strategy, though I wouldn't' close it for 50. Probably something more like 10 or 15.
I'm not saying it's *right*, but it'll work.
After which we can reorganize new criteria
you're going to have less strife than if you maintain a situation without a white supermajority
Okay, it's reasonable enough to reduce it down to a decade or two.
Not having a white supermajority matters less if you reduce the power of the federal government.
Even many on the "right" are cucks on such issues
See this
ending birthright citizenship is a great idea, tbh
I still don't agree that culture and race are intrinsically linked.
>Trump says administration looking 'seriously' at ending birthright citizenship
>lolberts and neocons flood the comments vehemently opposing it
reduce the power of the federal government how
they're not inseparable, but traits which are inherited from one can inform the other
*However*, the cultural corruption via mass immigration is notable and needs to be dealt with.
So, we end up reaching the same conclusion from different premises.
What even is a meaningful interpretation of culture without kinship
LP and big umbrella libertarians are controlled opposition
Murry Rothbard once said, the function of the LP is basically a containment area for all the worst libertarians.
Kinship doesn't mean blood/ethnic relations.
Start treating it as leadership for libertarians, and libertarianism is fucked
Learned that one by experience in the military, and hard knocks.
8,103 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/82
| Next