“ Woman gave boy, 14, drug so she could seduce him” by Mark Branagan on Metro

This child wasn’t seduced. He was drugged and raped. Flip the gender, and this article headline would be completely different.
http://archive.today/iymHI

“ Microsoft demands that Gab delete post calling for ‘eradication of all jews’ Microsoft has given the Alt-Right twitter alternative 48 hours to delete two offending posts before it shuts down the company’s cloud server account “
By Matthew Gault on MotherBoard

Article falsely calls Gab an alt-right twitter, it’s a free speech platform founded by two none Alt right guys, one of which isn’t even white. The article also says that Alex Jones is Alt-right, which is laughable.

http://archive.today/YFzsD

“ When New York City was the capital of American communism “ by Maurice Isserman on The New York Times Red Century 5/40

Whimsical look back on the highest point of power for communism in America, and its center of power, NYC. It also highlights a communist tactic of using immigrants and Anti-fascist alliances for recruitment. Sounds familiar doesn’t it?

http://archive.today/eFGGl

Tim Pool now shares my theory of a mass censorship purge for the 2020 election.
https://youtu.be/QW_DUZw0oC8

I feel like Alex Jones ban was justified to an extent, and I don't suspect they are going to start banning en mass but it does set a slippery slope.

These are private corporations after all

the private corp argument is not a good one imo

these are monopolies who can unperson you

electric companies can't refuse to give you electricity because you said something dumb

I’m definitely a pessimist on this issue. Remember this started with people like Jarred Taylor and Websites like The Daily Stormer. Now it’s hit Alex Jones.

From where I’m sitting it looks like we’ve already lost our footing on the slope, and are currently in full slide. The question is where does it stop.

I’m sympathetic to your perspective @Alexander Ramsey but I’m skeptical that the government is really going to help us. We have to find our own solutions. Not that I’m saying this is easy. We may just have to obfuscate who we are online and be prepared to live a nomadic lifestyle. Jumping from one website to another.

@Doctor Anon I’m curious, it what sense do you think the blanket ban of Alex Jones across multiple platforms and services was justified?

No website is currently good enough for mass ship jumping from YouTube or other similar platforms.
@Deleted User He *did* violate their ToS, specifically I'm looking on YouTube. And if you look into the info wars ToS, it's many times worse than YouTube's ToS. The hysteria is overblown when Infowars themselves are guilty of censorship on their platform of left wing views

Infowars ToS

*"it is not censorship if you violate the rules..." -infowars

It’s hard not to violate YoUTube TOS, but that is YouTube’s prerogative.

I don’t see how that Infowars TOS is worse than YouTubes. What is in the Infowars TOS that was violated by Infowars in the YoUTube TOS?

YouTube has bulling and hate speech in its TOS.

Not necessarily worse, but when I told people this ToS and said it's YouTube they were outraged, but when it's Infowars they don't really care. The fact they contain a clause for hate speech

Yeah I see it now

Infowars should be held to the same standards and they censor what they deem as hateful comments and accounts etc on their site, its ironic when they complain they are being censored on vauge hate speech charges when they are guilty of it themselves

YouTube is free to censor whoever they want, so is Infowars in their comments section. But if Infowars and Youtube behave the same, it’s clear then that they are both publishers, not platforms, and they have a political agenda.

I don't support censorship, but it's just hypocritical, the reactions.

I agree. I love open comments sections. Just nothing illegal.

I'd support a nationalized platform where rights are enforced but I don't think it's likely

YouTube has received subsidies so you can argue it could be nationalized legally

Right, like an internet bill of rights. I agree. It would be good. I also agree it’s not likely

I’ve seen people say that. Facebook and twitter have too I think.

At the end of the day it's dumb to assume that these platform's leaders don't have an agenda and will act accordingly

I don't think we'll see any major alternative to the major platforms for some time

Natural progression of corporations gurantees these platform's will be replaced, but it's a matter of when

It’s going to be awhile, that’s for sure. I’ll always be scouting these possible alternatives, but I’m thinking this current natural monopoly has about a decade.

@Doctor Anon Google/Microsoft are bigger monopolies than most registered monopolies

“ Trump and Sessions never has a plan-Except cruelty “ by Charles P. Pierce

Hysterical article claims that Trump and Sessions are racist against “ anyone browner then himself “ because an illegal alien got deported. Whomp whomp.

http://archive.today/0xEZI

“ Study: 24 million white Americans think like the Alt-Right “ by Zack Beauchamp on Vox

Vox makes the absurd claim that 24 million people think like the Alt-Right. All you needed to qualify for being what Vox has described as literal Nazis in past articles, are these three things. 1. A strong sense of white identity 2. A belief in the importance of white solidarity 3. A sense of white victimization. How many none whites think like this? Are they Alt-Right too?

http://archive.today/TX2QU

not everyone in the alt-right is a literal nazi

I know

Vox has said that in the past. Not me.

has this author described the alt-right that way?

vox is not a writer

it's an organization

So? You really think this writer would make that distinction? They’re trying to tie millions to the Alt-Right

Millions with nothing to do with them.

not necessarily

the alt-right isn't a cohesive thing

Vox is a publisher, and that’s who I was commenting on. So it doesn’t even matter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGEsN1v9cZA

“Missouri Republican who said “ Hitler was right” wins state house primary” by Josefin Dolsten / JTA on The Jerusalem Post

This article takes Steve West’s comments out of context. His claims are still controversial, but he isn’t supporting Hitlers holocaust as the title suggests. He’s critical of Zionism specifically and even says “ Jewish people can be beautiful people “

http://archive.today/iFFyw

Maybe. But it doesn’t look like he’s backing off his stance that much to me.

His Hitler was right was about Jewish influences Germany. Not the holocaust, which is to me, the most important part. He isn’t advocating fir genocide......well in those comments anyway.

“ FBI agent Strzok, who criticized Trump in text messages, is fired” by Sarah N. lynch on Reuters

This article dishonesty frames the firing of Strzok as being the result of him criticizing Trump in a privet conversation. The reality is that the text where he says “ we’ll stop him” (Trump) and talking about having an “ insurance policy “ if Trump wins to keep out of office, got him kicked off the Mueller investigation for bias. The decision to fire him for these reasons, among others, was made by Director David Bowdich. Not Trump.

Credit to https://www.reddit.com/r/headlinecorrections
http://archive.is/VEPNI

@Deleted User <#452955256960057385> please

this is news

Someone here mentioned my name?

nein

@itsme1718 I did when I gave you the citizen role

I used a bot to do it

it was faster to just tag you

Oh cool :+1:

CAR OF PEACE IN LONDON

SUSPECT ON THE LEFT

https://traditionalistreview.com/metaphysics-of-race-and-civilizations/

SURPRISE SURPRISE
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-45193514

I wonder who it could be

Really fires the synapses

alkalises that water

Ex friend and fired employee Omarosa has now written a tell all book. I have compiled a playlist on Youtube of all things Omarosa which is very juicy. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUcRHpQYR0Sbz1dr7kHOylYNGCV52aOfO

Smells like someone wants to be on the top selling list

not even the washington post will say omarosa is legit

So many liars cashing in on Trump

lol

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/08/has-bezos-become-more-powerful-in-dc-than-trump

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34781/hogg-announces-run-office-touts-ocasio-cortez-ryan-saavedra

Hahahahaha

if that man runs for office were fucked

doesn't matter if he runs if he wins it's a bad sign

Cortez is mentally unstable

Hogg is just an angry autist looking for tendies

i havnt heard of cortez

Mfw

Anyone can run for office @ken

im not saying he cant but im saying were fucked

Usually just have to pay a few or sometimes get petition signatures

Nah

I don't think it matters who runs

All that matters is how well they perform electorally

vermin supreme ran for president and it didn't destroy the country

Vermin supreme isn't at the scale of cortez