Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 477976561665048598
YouTube is free to censor whoever they want, so is Infowars in their comments section. But if Infowars and Youtube behave the same, it’s clear then that they are both publishers, not platforms, and they have a political agenda.
I don't support censorship, but it's just hypocritical, the reactions.
I agree. I love open comments sections. Just nothing illegal.
I'd support a nationalized platform where rights are enforced but I don't think it's likely
YouTube has received subsidies so you can argue it could be nationalized legally
Right, like an internet bill of rights. I agree. It would be good. I also agree it’s not likely
I’ve seen people say that. Facebook and twitter have too I think.
At the end of the day it's dumb to assume that these platform's leaders don't have an agenda and will act accordingly
I don't think we'll see any major alternative to the major platforms for some time
Natural progression of corporations gurantees these platform's will be replaced, but it's a matter of when
It’s going to be awhile, that’s for sure. I’ll always be scouting these possible alternatives, but I’m thinking this current natural monopoly has about a decade.
@Doctor Anon Google/Microsoft are bigger monopolies than most registered monopolies
“ Trump and Sessions never has a plan-Except cruelty “ by Charles P. Pierce
Hysterical article claims that Trump and Sessions are racist against “ anyone browner then himself “ because an illegal alien got deported. Whomp whomp.
http://archive.today/0xEZI
“ Study: 24 million white Americans think like the Alt-Right “ by Zack Beauchamp on Vox
Vox makes the absurd claim that 24 million people think like the Alt-Right. All you needed to qualify for being what Vox has described as literal Nazis in past articles, are these three things. 1. A strong sense of white identity 2. A belief in the importance of white solidarity 3. A sense of white victimization. How many none whites think like this? Are they Alt-Right too?
http://archive.today/TX2QU
not everyone in the alt-right is a literal nazi
I know
has this author described the alt-right that way?
vox is not a writer
it's an organization
So? You really think this writer would make that distinction? They’re trying to tie millions to the Alt-Right
Millions with nothing to do with them.
not necessarily
the alt-right isn't a cohesive thing
Vox is a publisher, and that’s who I was commenting on. So it doesn’t even matter
“Missouri Republican who said “ Hitler was right” wins state house primary” by Josefin Dolsten / JTA on The Jerusalem Post
This article takes Steve West’s comments out of context. His claims are still controversial, but he isn’t supporting Hitlers holocaust as the title suggests. He’s critical of Zionism specifically and even says “ Jewish people can be beautiful people “
http://archive.today/iFFyw
Maybe. But it doesn’t look like he’s backing off his stance that much to me.
His Hitler was right was about Jewish influences Germany. Not the holocaust, which is to me, the most important part. He isn’t advocating fir genocide......well in those comments anyway.
“ FBI agent Strzok, who criticized Trump in text messages, is fired” by Sarah N. lynch on Reuters
This article dishonesty frames the firing of Strzok as being the result of him criticizing Trump in a privet conversation. The reality is that the text where he says “ we’ll stop him” (Trump) and talking about having an “ insurance policy “ if Trump wins to keep out of office, got him kicked off the Mueller investigation for bias. The decision to fire him for these reasons, among others, was made by Director David Bowdich. Not Trump.
Credit to https://www.reddit.com/r/headlinecorrections
http://archive.is/VEPNI
@Deleted User <#452955256960057385> please
this is news