text-for-voice-chats

Discord ID: 564598119590002708


15,969 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 41/160 | Next

2019-04-17 05:53:32 UTC

๐Ÿค”

2019-04-17 06:09:04 UTC

Btw

2019-04-17 06:09:33 UTC

The difference in mass from the equator and the north pole is 5.5 ounces per 100 lbs

2019-04-17 06:10:37 UTC

"Not interested in your mathmatical religion"

2019-04-17 06:10:58 UTC

Thats the idea, and you then take measurements to *prove the model*

2019-04-17 06:11:28 UTC

This is a large VC.

Math does ***NOT*** directly reflect reality.

Math is a tool.

Nothing more.

***Nothing more!***

2019-04-17 06:12:20 UTC

You need to do a re-creatable experiment, and when your formuale match measured data accounted after taking other factors into account, then you have ecidence

2019-04-17 06:12:35 UTC

You can't sit in a dark room with no windows, jot down a bit of math, and assume you've proven a globe. That's so far beyond ludicrous and outrageously insulting to science.

๐Ÿ”Ž

2019-04-17 06:14:28 UTC

Sure

๐Ÿค” .....

2019-04-17 06:14:48 UTC

But you also cant just ignore all data and measurement that matches the math

Like?

You have a scientific method experiment for the radius?

2019-04-17 06:15:22 UTC

If you make a mathematical formula, and then the data from the real world fits, your formula is probably right

2019-04-17 06:15:33 UTC

And yes.

There's an assumed calculation for the radius, but an experiment?

Find this experiment

I call bullshit because I have searched for this experiment for the last 3-4 years.

That's not a scientific method experiment.

That's an assumption

2019-04-17 06:17:27 UTC

Lol no

2019-04-17 06:17:33 UTC

Thats the whole thing

That's not a scientific method experiment.

2019-04-17 06:17:43 UTC

If it was wrong it would not be consistent

Where is the observation?

Where is the independent variable?

Where is the dependant variable?

You're basically doing the same thing as I mentioned, earlier. That's basically sitting in a dark room with no windows and using math to reflect reality and assumed the math to be accurate.

2019-04-17 06:21:57 UTC

There were no assumptions

2019-04-17 06:22:08 UTC

If the math is wrong, it wont mach real data

2019-04-17 06:22:41 UTC

All the math, and the real world data

2019-04-17 06:22:46 UTC

Match the globe

2019-04-17 06:23:07 UTC

Also wtf does denying causality mean?

2019-04-17 06:26:44 UTC

Aight

2019-04-17 06:26:46 UTC

So

2019-04-17 06:26:56 UTC

Wtf am i muted for?

2019-04-17 06:27:43 UTC

Im sti muted

2019-04-17 06:29:47 UTC

Yaaay

Be right back

2019-04-17 06:36:59 UTC

@Fearless Crusader
Scientists using The Scientific Method have PROVEN ...

1. Water boils at 212ยฐF (100ยฐC) at sea level (one atmosphere of pressure: 101.325 kPa or 14.7 psi).
2. Combustion is the result of Oxidation Reactions.
3. Information is ONLY caused by Intelligent Agency.
4. Lack of Insulin with Type 1 DM Patients results in Ketoacidosis (DKA).
5. Lack of Vit C intake in humans results in Scurvy.
6. Knowledge (or the Existence) of the 'Which-Path' Information Collapses The Wave Function.
7. The rapid motion and collisions of molecules with the walls of the container "CAUSES" Gas Pressure.
8. Magnetism is caused by the motion of Electric Charge.
9. The Coriolis Force is caused by two differing Frames of Reference: One Rotating Coordinate System (Non-Inertial) and One Non-Rotating Coordinate System (Inertial).
10. Gluconeogenesis results in the production of Glucose from specific Non-Carbohydrate Precursors.

These are ABSOLUTELY TRUE, PROVEN, INVIOLABLE, NEVER to be FALSIFIED !!!

So "DICK" is in Error (AGAIN).

New vid

lol, man ..take a PIc of YOUR bottle! <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> lols

.
***and, i seen your Links, u posted, ..i clicked
but yeah ..
--you got a pic of YOUR bottle (right now)? or? no? ..

2019-04-17 07:02:37 UTC
2019-04-17 07:02:46 UTC

The light bends based on gravity

2019-04-17 07:02:56 UTC

Not based on air gradients

2019-04-17 07:03:15 UTC

It reflects based on refractive properties of the medium

2019-04-17 07:04:15 UTC

Materials with a high absorption factor absorb it more, but the density does not change lights curving

2019-04-17 07:04:22 UTC

It is pulled by gravity

2019-04-17 07:04:50 UTC

If light passes near earth, it will be pulled down based on the relative mass

--Look at "Me" (in there) lol, ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿ‘
http://prntscr.com/nd1ns7

*(Im in "Vc" right now, but eh..was also ..multitasking and catching up on some messages etc) and

2019-04-17 07:05:56 UTC

So how do i get vetted?

2019-04-17 07:06:18 UTC

I promise not to spamm

2019-04-17 07:06:23 UTC

Or be rude

..i made 2 pics.. (of that)

lol, ..bc ..my "Description" (on my "About" page/secttion) lol is GOOD ๐Ÿ˜† ๐Ÿ‘ ......

check 'er out ...

2019-04-17 07:10:47 UTC

Lolnice

LET ME POST lol!

dang u lol

2019-04-17 07:11:00 UTC

Kek

.
jumped in the middle!

.. ๐Ÿ˜†

.

--cont
(rest of my post) .............

<:trolled:555217274907262976>

u fkn GlobeHeads! lmao

.
i "Made my bones" (on "FE" )? >> 5+ years ago
..in "comment sections" etccc

on "FE Video Pages (Videooo "comment" sections)--etc

*jus syn ๐Ÿ‘

2019-04-17 07:13:52 UTC
2019-04-17 07:14:05 UTC

There are also multiple definitions of words

2019-04-17 07:14:14 UTC

Not all can be drawn out with meaning

2019-04-17 07:14:40 UTC

By that logic you could.say a supermodle is an object that people think is reasonable

2019-04-17 07:14:58 UTC

Or a tightrope is a scale

2019-04-17 07:15:26 UTC

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/564598119590002708/567971366758776832/FlatEarth.png

2019-04-17 07:15:38 UTC

SPIRIT LEVEL 1: 0 GLOBE EARTH ACTUAL PROOFS

EDIT
Zoomed-in Version
.. ๐Ÿ”Ž https://prnt.sc/nd1tfc

๐Ÿ”Ž

2019-04-17 07:23:07 UTC

same

I like listening to debates but it feels like an epic troll

im not Claiming THAT is the real deal but ๐Ÿ˜†

2019-04-17 08:03:55 UTC

Invalid arguments provided: User "this" not found

15,969 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev | Page 41/160 | Next