There's an assumed calculation for the radius, but an experiment?

Find this experiment

I call bullshit because I have searched for this experiment for the last 3-4 years.

https://www.quora.com/When-and-how-did-scientists-measure-the-radius-of-the-earth

That's not a scientific method experiment.

That's an assumption

Lol no

Thats the whole thing

That's not a scientific method experiment.

If it was wrong it would not be consistent

Where is the observation?

Where is the independent variable?

Where is the dependant variable?

You're basically doing the same thing as I mentioned, earlier. That's basically sitting in a dark room with no windows and using math to reflect reality and assumed the math to be accurate.

There were no assumptions

If the math is wrong, it wont mach real data

All the math, and the real world data

Match the globe

Also wtf does denying causality mean?

Aight

So

Wtf am i muted for?

Im sti muted

Yaaay

Be right back

@Fearless Crusader
Scientists using The Scientific Method have PROVEN ...

1. Water boils at 212°F (100°C) at sea level (one atmosphere of pressure: 101.325 kPa or 14.7 psi).
2. Combustion is the result of Oxidation Reactions.
3. Information is ONLY caused by Intelligent Agency.
4. Lack of Insulin with Type 1 DM Patients results in Ketoacidosis (DKA).
5. Lack of Vit C intake in humans results in Scurvy.
6. Knowledge (or the Existence) of the 'Which-Path' Information Collapses The Wave Function.
7. The rapid motion and collisions of molecules with the walls of the container "CAUSES" Gas Pressure.
8. Magnetism is caused by the motion of Electric Charge.
9. The Coriolis Force is caused by two differing Frames of Reference: One Rotating Coordinate System (Non-Inertial) and One Non-Rotating Coordinate System (Inertial).
10. Gluconeogenesis results in the production of Glucose from specific Non-Carbohydrate Precursors.

These are ABSOLUTELY TRUE, PROVEN, INVIOLABLE, NEVER to be FALSIFIED !!!

So "DICK" is in Error (AGAIN).

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bawls.com/&ved=2ahUKEwjavK27xNbhAhUDr54KHVfIB8gQFjARegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw2S0dXZpk_PjPb6Lbsge9vc

https://youtu.be/QrUxkB0PT9I

New vid

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.totalwine.com/spirits/american-whiskey/rye-whiskey/darbys-reserve-rye-whiskey/p/128756750&ved=2ahUKEwiXwOG0xdbhAhVPJzQIHXZ1DVgQFjABegQIBRAC&usg=AOvVaw1GfokFfKc7JoLceupCbWXx

@Fearless Crusader

lol, man ..take a PIc of YOUR bottle! <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594> lols

.
***and, i seen your Links, u posted, ..i clicked
but yeah ..
--you got a pic of YOUR bottle (right now)? or? no? ..

@Human Sheeple

The light bends based on gravity

Not based on air gradients

It reflects based on refractive properties of the medium

Materials with a high absorption factor absorb it more, but the density does not change lights curving

It is pulled by gravity

If light passes near earth, it will be pulled down based on the relative mass

--Look at "Me" (in there) lol, 😆 👍
http://prntscr.com/nd1ns7