Message from @Fearless Crusader

Discord ID: 567956776918581248


2019-04-17 06:11:43 UTC  

Math is a tool.

2019-04-17 06:11:50 UTC  

Nothing more.

2019-04-17 06:12:03 UTC  

***Nothing more!***

2019-04-17 06:12:20 UTC  

You need to do a re-creatable experiment, and when your formuale match measured data accounted after taking other factors into account, then you have ecidence

2019-04-17 06:12:35 UTC  
2019-04-17 06:14:01 UTC  

You can't sit in a dark room with no windows, jot down a bit of math, and assume you've proven a globe. That's so far beyond ludicrous and outrageously insulting to science.

2019-04-17 06:14:18 UTC  

🔎

2019-04-17 06:14:28 UTC  

Sure

2019-04-17 06:14:46 UTC  

🤔 .....

2019-04-17 06:14:48 UTC  

But you also cant just ignore all data and measurement that matches the math

2019-04-17 06:14:59 UTC  

Like?

2019-04-17 06:15:07 UTC  

You have a scientific method experiment for the radius?

2019-04-17 06:15:22 UTC  

If you make a mathematical formula, and then the data from the real world fits, your formula is probably right

2019-04-17 06:15:33 UTC  

And yes.

2019-04-17 06:15:41 UTC  

There's an assumed calculation for the radius, but an experiment?

2019-04-17 06:15:50 UTC  

Find this experiment

2019-04-17 06:16:29 UTC  

I call bullshit because I have searched for this experiment for the last 3-4 years.

2019-04-17 06:16:51 UTC  

That's not a scientific method experiment.

2019-04-17 06:16:59 UTC  

That's an assumption

2019-04-17 06:17:27 UTC  

Lol no

2019-04-17 06:17:33 UTC  

Thats the whole thing

2019-04-17 06:17:35 UTC  

That's not a scientific method experiment.

2019-04-17 06:17:43 UTC  

If it was wrong it would not be consistent

2019-04-17 06:17:50 UTC  

Where is the observation?

2019-04-17 06:18:04 UTC  

Where is the independent variable?

2019-04-17 06:18:12 UTC  

Where is the dependant variable?

2019-04-17 06:19:48 UTC  

You're basically doing the same thing as I mentioned, earlier. That's basically sitting in a dark room with no windows and using math to reflect reality and assumed the math to be accurate.

2019-04-17 06:21:57 UTC  

There were no assumptions

2019-04-17 06:22:08 UTC  

If the math is wrong, it wont mach real data

2019-04-17 06:22:41 UTC  

All the math, and the real world data

2019-04-17 06:22:46 UTC  

Match the globe

2019-04-17 06:23:07 UTC  

Also wtf does denying causality mean?

2019-04-17 06:26:44 UTC  

Aight

2019-04-17 06:26:46 UTC  

So

2019-04-17 06:26:56 UTC  

Wtf am i muted for?

2019-04-17 06:27:43 UTC  

Im sti muted

2019-04-17 06:29:47 UTC  

Yaaay

2019-04-17 06:30:42 UTC  

Be right back

2019-04-17 06:36:59 UTC  

@Fearless Crusader
Scientists using The Scientific Method have PROVEN ...

1. Water boils at 212°F (100°C) at sea level (one atmosphere of pressure: 101.325 kPa or 14.7 psi).
2. Combustion is the result of Oxidation Reactions.
3. Information is ONLY caused by Intelligent Agency.
4. Lack of Insulin with Type 1 DM Patients results in Ketoacidosis (DKA).
5. Lack of Vit C intake in humans results in Scurvy.
6. Knowledge (or the Existence) of the 'Which-Path' Information Collapses The Wave Function.
7. The rapid motion and collisions of molecules with the walls of the container "CAUSES" Gas Pressure.
8. Magnetism is caused by the motion of Electric Charge.
9. The Coriolis Force is caused by two differing Frames of Reference: One Rotating Coordinate System (Non-Inertial) and One Non-Rotating Coordinate System (Inertial).
10. Gluconeogenesis results in the production of Glucose from specific Non-Carbohydrate Precursors.

These are ABSOLUTELY TRUE, PROVEN, INVIOLABLE, NEVER to be FALSIFIED !!!

So "DICK" is in Error (AGAIN).