Message from @Fearless Crusader
Discord ID: 567956297069101057
🤔
Btw
The difference in mass from the equator and the north pole is 5.5 ounces per 100 lbs
"Not interested in your mathmatical religion"
Thats the idea, and you then take measurements to *prove the model*
This is a large VC.
Math does ***NOT*** directly reflect reality.
Math is a tool.
Nothing more.
***Nothing more!***
You need to do a re-creatable experiment, and when your formuale match measured data accounted after taking other factors into account, then you have ecidence
You can't sit in a dark room with no windows, jot down a bit of math, and assume you've proven a globe. That's so far beyond ludicrous and outrageously insulting to science.
🔎
Sure
🤔 .....
But you also cant just ignore all data and measurement that matches the math
Like?
You have a scientific method experiment for the radius?
If you make a mathematical formula, and then the data from the real world fits, your formula is probably right
There's an assumed calculation for the radius, but an experiment?
Find this experiment
I call bullshit because I have searched for this experiment for the last 3-4 years.
That's not a scientific method experiment.
That's an assumption
Lol no
Thats the whole thing
That's not a scientific method experiment.
If it was wrong it would not be consistent
Where is the observation?
Where is the independent variable?
Where is the dependant variable?
You're basically doing the same thing as I mentioned, earlier. That's basically sitting in a dark room with no windows and using math to reflect reality and assumed the math to be accurate.
There were no assumptions
If the math is wrong, it wont mach real data
All the math, and the real world data
Match the globe
Also wtf does denying causality mean?
Aight