there it is

I found archimedes' equation

@Angry Analysis Podcast you cant explain anything

It sounds like if they built a bridge that went all the way "around" the world connecting to itself, people would still argue that the earth is flat/round.

@Dragon the Redcoat measurements is not causation

hmm?

?

can you hear me in vc?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/zeteticzen.wordpress.com/2017/06/15/gravity-does-not-exist-the-lorentz-contraction-conundrum/amp/

Dielectric Voidance is the direction and Dielectric Acceleration is the attraction.

😂

https://youtu.be/GeyDf4ooPdo

Centrifugal force ☝️😂

Alright, <@!432584762146947073> has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

Centrifugal force doesn’t exist.

🤔

Btw

The difference in mass from the equator and the north pole is 5.5 ounces per 100 lbs

"Not interested in your mathmatical religion"

Thats the idea, and you then take measurements to *prove the model*

This is a large VC.

Math does ***NOT*** directly reflect reality.

Math is a tool.

Nothing more.

***Nothing more!***

You need to do a re-creatable experiment, and when your formuale match measured data accounted after taking other factors into account, then you have ecidence

@Human Sheeple

You can't sit in a dark room with no windows, jot down a bit of math, and assume you've proven a globe. That's so far beyond ludicrous and outrageously insulting to science.

🔎

Sure

🤔 .....

But you also cant just ignore all data and measurement that matches the math

Like?

You have a scientific method experiment for the radius?

If you make a mathematical formula, and then the data from the real world fits, your formula is probably right

And yes.

There's an assumed calculation for the radius, but an experiment?

Find this experiment

I call bullshit because I have searched for this experiment for the last 3-4 years.

https://www.quora.com/When-and-how-did-scientists-measure-the-radius-of-the-earth