no young-earth creationist

like do you believe earth was created 6000 years ago in 6 days by God?

I'll respect that one act but as a whole I may or may not respect him as a being

I believe that humans have only been on this flat earth for roughly 6 to 10 K years

Of course lol

ok even tho the radiometric dating says otherwise

I have no proof, its just a belief

and you reject the scientific consensus of african migrations and Neanderthals and all?

I think much like everything science does, they fake it

multiple dating techniques agree

fake

ok

have you heard about the latest findings with dinosaurs?

?

no what about it?

I've performed a lot of radiometric dating myself, all of which has been accurate.

they found soft tissue in it, doctors found it and send it to the lab

false

this didn't happen in one isolated incident

its happened multiple times

They found remains of the very ruged protienes

they are finding soft tissue in dinosaur bones, still alive

cells still alive

They only found traces of it after they put the fossil into acids to dissolve the rock

now I can definitely say that's false

of course they would say its untrue

you being a talking point saying its not doesn't make it so

And of course you would say it's true*

I'm saying that its likely that they are being censored

I'm sure the people who did the tests themselves would actually say you have a misunderstanding

I’m tired. Going back to bed. 💤

much like anything main stream tries to keep quiet

:sweet dreams:

it's traces detected by acid treatment

and by microscope

And as someone that's performed radiometric dating myself many times.. nope, not being censored. No academic scientists are.

main stream is actually what gave you that idea in the first place

publishers trying to make a story

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9rI6uxSC9A

kev

https://isgenesishistory.com/soft-tissue/

what would scientists getout of falsifying chronology?

they wanted to keep it quiet

why

but why?

you had one doctor send a specimen to the lab and they dated it, and then this person told them it was a dinosaur bone, and the lab shut that person off from ever sending them anything else again

they are practicing scientism, not real science

I'm.sure they had a real reason

excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques

In that case I see no problem with it(minus the excessive)

again _why_ would they do that?

they aren't truthers

an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable

they don't give a damn about science, or they care too much, either way, people often don't see the reason, or they are too compartmentalized.

I get my pay check and do my family stuff

its work

a hypothesis only becomes a theory when it has been tested and repedatly failed to be falsified

idea doesn't have to be falsified

?

an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable

yes

idea doesn't have to be falsified

you said falsified

not falsifiable

idea is just an idea

yes

don't speak gibberish

a bird is just a bird

I don't either

idea can be false or true

Sigma5 speaks much gibberish

Not just can

A hypothesis must be falsifiable

an idea is a concept to do something, whether it can be falsified has no bearing on what practical applications it can have

I was recently exposed to the probability that most of Einstien's theories were fake

fake math

And you believe that lol?

I understand the math of special relativity and it's sound

especially when you understand how he derived it

He actually derived it from an idea of aether

I saw another flat earther in a debate, and he said no matter what way you cut the bread (synopsis), einstien is wrong

they tried to argue but it was pretty much, Einstien was an idiot and wrong

that was the conclusion from the debate

but the derived formulas are simpler than the original so by ocxams Razer he threw out aether

Well then whoever came to that conclusion was an idiot and wrong

you can come to that conclusion yourself

the debate is open to look at

I could if I was an idiot maybe

special relativity is consistent with aether

o/

hi Z

But the reality is nope, special relativity is incredibly precise and accurate

I agree that's bad

Hi

how you doing

citizen Z you transphobic too?

Good. Tired

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHA_SAWYKEw this was the debate