https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jhl5yeZlltI

for student issue video ... porhaps its relevant: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Drew-Cloud-Is-a-Well-Known/243217

Wow, Vic Berger really sperged out on Tim’s video, then deleted everything. Unreal.

Doesn’t help his case

I have heard a rumour, that Blaire White pegged Paul Joseph Watson. I (a nobody) reached out to both of them, and got no response (expected). So where from here? I don't want to spread fake news, I didn't get any denial, equality I didn't get any evidence or admittance.
Is this how truth gets covered up and forgotten?

https://nypost.com/2018/05/22/dozens-of-foreign-isis-brides-sentenced-to-death-in-iraq/

hmm iraq hate explody tribe thots too?

huh i love iraq now

To quote Count Dankula: "Thot???"

its foreign brides. so the question is, do the make a distinction between basically kidnap victims and people who knew what they were doing

I sure as hell hope so

its a Muslim country. By their beliefs these women are basically sentenced to death anyway.

i mean, either they were kidnapped and therefore probably raped, which is punishable by death. or willing participants in their oppression. also punishable by death.

but, you know, religion of peace and female empowerment!

Apostasy? Also punishable by death

Criticize the Qu'ran? Punishable by death

Be an infidel? Punishable by death

Be a Muslim but not "Muslim enough"? Death

I have no say in what Muslims themselves do with their religion. It's their own job to clean their room

@angeryer what did vic say?

Muslims need to listen to JP then? lmao

Did you guys see the Hugo and Jake thing on Jordan Peterson?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_Wh67H0vws&t=0s

@Timcast check the pinned comment on your Gavin video, he was commenting there and someone copied a few of his comments for posterity since he deleted all but one. The only one left is him saying “deleted them because all of Pool’s fans are disgusting.”

Holy shit the guy got THAT salty?

Jesus

Also what a coward for deleting his comments.

I was wondering what all these random replies were going to.

People who want to dish it out but can't handle shit in return act in that manner

You seem them all over

respect wahmen https://twitter.com/qikipedia/status/999273746522238976?s=20

Correlation is not causation, maybe all the shit husbands got killed off.

^

lmao

"I mean that could also have to do with the Arsenic Act of 1851 which meant written records had to be kept of arsenic buyers and sellers"

i feel like those 2 acts were related, regardless

i thought of a cool way to increase engagement. Im going to poll people on my community section and put it in my videos everyday

That IS a good idea. Have a daily poll for people to answer

Or weekly polls

@Timcast I like that idea.

^

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/23/trump-cant-block-twitter-followers-federal-judge-says.html

The big question being, does this just apply to Trump, only to public officials, only to celebrities or public personalities, or does it apply to everyone?

Now they care about the 1A?

Lel this must be new low for guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/23/kendrick-lamar-white-rap-fans-n-word-off-limits

You can sing n words only when black

A Texas DPS officer was accused of sexual harassment of a suspect over the weekend.

😏

And of course, since the suspect was black

Shaun King made an uproar

Calling the officer out by name.

Death threats ensued.

Footage was released

Where we are right now, the law firm hired to peruse the matters has apologized.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/399768565038972928/448826525891035137/image.jpg

Also @Timcast here is another of those backfire policy stories. https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/labour-self-identification-transgender-woman-david-lewis-womens-officer/

You did predict this will happen

Still, both the officer, and another unrelated officer who shares the same name, as well as their families, are facing death threats.

"A man has been suspended from Labour after he attempted to subvert the party’s rules on gender self-identification. Party activist David Lewis claimed he identified as a woman “on Wednesdays”, and so was eligible to stand for the constituency Labour Party’s (CLP) women’s officer position, as the election happened to fall on a Wednesday."

Nice chrono trigger avatar BTW.

Frog needs a beanie.

Probably the best way to reverse the stupid gender stuff that's been going on is just make a huge joke out of it.

Like that meme going around that if Trump said he was a women for a day to become the first women president lol.

The far left would fall apart.

They would

"I, President Donald J. Trump, now identify as your first woman President"

The Far-Left and a lot of people on the Left in general would just.. Go into full breakdown

They would have to admit that either people can't just choose their own gender or that Trump is the first female president.

I have long hair, and as part of a celebration of some of my Scottish ancestry, have access to kilts . If I opted to shave my beard and wax my legs, I wonder how hard it would be to pretend to be trans for like a month or so to prove how easy it is to exploit this law.

You don’t even need to go through all that effort.

It would make things easier

Theoreticaly its all about what you claim

Thats why it is so stupid

Well clearly it's not. Even if that is what is written.

It's what people believe about your claim (also stupid)

But given activist judges and the fact actually trans people get kicked out of the left, it would be a better proof of point.

Also, it would make them question anyone else who claims to be trans. Which then makes them transphobs

https://twitter.com/TwitterMoments/status/999332795406172160

So this happned

S M O K E O U T C H A L L E N G E

I think the ruling about Trump is that Twitter is a public forum so Trump can’t block people. If Twitter is now considered a public forum instead of a private one then twitter themselves can’t remove people from the platform either. Should be interesting how this plays out.

I hope someone with some pennys kicking around can take this to court.

he will appeal and win, prolly

well, the question begs, is it a public form in the eyes of a government official, but a private entity. I.E. you can't block the public but the public can block you kind of deal

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/999357298861486080

oof

Trump's Twatter account is a private account. Even after becoming POTUS this fact didn't change. As a private citizen on that front he have a right to block people

hahahahaha. Elon spittin some truth.

@Yakamaru are you a private citizen while president?

Uhh, yes

Even as a public servant you are not exempt from social platform's CoC/ToS

They apply equally across the board

He is using the account in a private manner

what does CoC/ToS have to do with being allowed to block people, exactly? aside from giving him the ability to on their end

i was not aware not blocking people violates twitters ToS.

there is two sides here. Twitter giving him the ability, and if he should be allowed to exercise it

it certainly doesn't look good for any public servant to prevent any member of the public from contact them

even if it may be justified at times

as it sends a message of "your concerns are not valid to me"

And what if they are doing nothing but screech at them?