Message from @Grenade123

Discord ID: 448922026443538459


2018-05-23 17:42:30 UTC  

So this happned

2018-05-23 17:43:54 UTC  

S M O K E O U T C H A L L E N G E

2018-05-23 18:24:06 UTC  

I think the ruling about Trump is that Twitter is a public forum so Trump can’t block people. If Twitter is now considered a public forum instead of a private one then twitter themselves can’t remove people from the platform either. Should be interesting how this plays out.

2018-05-23 18:25:08 UTC  

I hope someone with some pennys kicking around can take this to court.

2018-05-23 18:33:59 UTC  

he will appeal and win, prolly

2018-05-23 18:35:41 UTC  

well, the question begs, is it a public form in the eyes of a government official, but a private entity. I.E. you can't block the public but the public can block you kind of deal

2018-05-23 18:46:21 UTC  

oof

2018-05-23 18:49:45 UTC  

Trump's Twatter account is a private account. Even after becoming POTUS this fact didn't change. As a private citizen on that front he have a right to block people

2018-05-23 18:50:10 UTC  

hahahahaha. Elon spittin some truth.

2018-05-23 18:50:29 UTC  

@Yakamaru are you a private citizen while president?

2018-05-23 18:50:37 UTC  

Uhh, yes

2018-05-23 18:51:13 UTC  

Even as a public servant you are not exempt from social platform's CoC/ToS

2018-05-23 18:51:33 UTC  

They apply equally across the board

2018-05-23 18:52:18 UTC  

He is using the account in a private manner

2018-05-23 18:52:54 UTC  

what does CoC/ToS have to do with being allowed to block people, exactly? aside from giving him the ability to on their end

2018-05-23 18:53:17 UTC  

i was not aware not blocking people violates twitters ToS.

2018-05-23 18:53:59 UTC  

there is two sides here. Twitter giving him the ability, and if he should be allowed to exercise it

2018-05-23 18:55:02 UTC  

it certainly doesn't look good for any public servant to prevent any member of the public from contact them

2018-05-23 18:55:09 UTC  

even if it may be justified at times

2018-05-23 18:55:51 UTC  

as it sends a message of "your concerns are not valid to me"

2018-05-23 18:56:31 UTC  

And what if they are doing nothing but screech at them?

2018-05-23 18:56:38 UTC  

Being an asshole?

2018-05-23 18:56:41 UTC  

It's protected.

2018-05-23 18:57:10 UTC  

being an asshole and determining if their screeching is valid is subjective.

2018-05-23 18:57:25 UTC  

hence why it never looks good, regardless of how justified it might be

2018-05-23 18:57:38 UTC  

I wonder if Twitter artificially bumping up negative replies on Trumps Twitter and hiding positive ones also violates 1A rights if his Twitter is a public space.

2018-05-23 18:58:28 UTC  

i think there is a difference between twitter blocking their users from talking and trump doing it.

2018-05-23 18:58:36 UTC  

its their platform, their rules.

2018-05-23 18:59:04 UTC  

But if his twitter is considered a public forum it might be different.

2018-05-23 18:59:16 UTC  

well thats the question

2018-05-23 18:59:52 UTC  

because him not being allowed to block people is a restriction on his conduct while on the job of president

2018-05-23 18:59:58 UTC  

According to that it is a public forum.

2018-05-23 19:00:12 UTC  

then twitter has lost control of their platform

2018-05-23 19:00:32 UTC  

what are the "public form" doctrines

2018-05-23 19:00:51 UTC  

I agree. It doesn't look good. Though it's a private account, one that he controls. If that account is going to be considered a public platform, would his be the only one being affected by it?

2018-05-23 19:00:59 UTC  

nope

2018-05-23 19:01:00 UTC  

can't

2018-05-23 19:01:11 UTC  

thinkabout everyone who was banned from twitter

2018-05-23 19:01:17 UTC  

this sets a huge prescendence