Extremely badly in a sense

If it was to at least explain what it means with a lot of shit, it needs at least 3 a4 pages on each thing

Otherwise you could draw a very weird conclusion compared to the literature

For example: We (communists) want to abolish the family. Now, we do not want to abolish it to remover families altogether, what we want to abolish is the family you (the bourgeois) know of.

People take that out of it's context considering it's time and try to apply it in today, in which case they get the impression that here should be no homeschooling and society is the parents

Read other literature where they, Marx and Engels, talk about the family and what they want to change, they explain some fundamental differences between the working classes families and the bourgeois families

Thats the issue if it takes thousands of pages.

TO come to one conclusion

And then crush it down to double digits

and in short, most the points are that the labourers kids should have equall opportunity as the bourgeois kids

Yes

And considering that time period, the summary I gave wouldn't work

Then how did it become what it is now?

People forget that a different time period must be considered not only as to why something was worded the way it was, but also why it wasn't worded in a, in our time, better way

How the hell did it turn from empowering the worker to subjugating the population

As you said, ppl are lazy and just read the manifesto

And then someone on top realises if he cherry picks pages from Das Kapital he can get ppl on his side to help him get more power

Jesus its like the koran

I've met communists that are like "I have only read some parts of Das Kapital" and coincidentally it os the parts in which the state is the hero and the companies are evil. Never a single part that praises parts of capitalism

Or that distinguishes percieved capitalism from actual capitalism

He does explain how the free market, on the contrary to how it is percieved, is separate from capitalism

Have you heard of a commie that is part of a big commie group ever say anything like that?

They are always against the free market because it is capitalistic (in a russian accent)

Ive never met a commie like that. You know, one that knows that much. But then again, Im not gonna pretend I read Marx's work

You consider me a commie?

I didnt say that

Like I said I never met a commie that knows that much.

Much like I never met a christian who knows the bible beyond memorizing verses

Oh, ok

Just checking

The people I find more knowledgable on relligion ive met are people who dont practice it as much

I would probably consider myself a Marxist if it wasn't for those that already do. Don't wanna be associated with those shets

As they are more likely to question it

And Id considermyself ancap if it wernt for those who already do

I'd say I am a decentralist

To be honest, govt seizing the means of production does not scream decentralization

I know

The reason real communisms haven't existed is because there has always been a state. They want to rid of the state

But so called communists want to first make the state own EVERYTHING, and then rid of the state. Good luck making someone with all that power give it up

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/04/upshot/up-birth-age-gap.html

This article basically flat out says younger mothers are no less happy but "have greater gender inequality, the horror!" (As if it is bad that a woman wants to specialize in caring for a child) and that children are part to blame for the wage gap in a more round about way

It also basically says "when money is not the goal, having a family is more important". As if that is a bad thing

Which is true

Yeah, kids are expensive. But like, since when is specializing and family bad things

Since cultural cancer came

When both nazis and commies agree on something, you should take it into concideration. Both of them thought that motherhood should be praised, unlike today when it is almost frowned upon. But they did think very differently about the family and other related stuff

Well, with today I mean todays elite

More or less

i think society got too strict with its standards, forcing a pushback in the opposite direction. Now we are reaching the opposite extreme and the push back is building

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/dave-bautista-says-he-will-do-next-guardians-movie-james-gunn-1132316

dave bautista punches nazis what a hero

GoG3 is gonna tank because of politics. Perhaps not a bad thing because there is some pretty SJW movies coming down the pipes in the MCU

That really sucks because I had a lot of hope for it. It was gonna be like three awesome movies in a row and how often is a sequal and threequal just as good?

there is a chance the movie itself will turn out fine

but i fear even if it is decent, it will get boycotted by all sides

companies are too stupid to realize that playing the political game just means you put yourself in the crosshairs of both sides.

You become a pawn to be used

That is true

and both sides will use that pawn until it is dried up

The MCU is going to tank soon anyway with the start of Phase 4 if they're going to be going all in on the heroes that are tanking the conics side of things.

^

comics*

because they lost all sense of reality

"marvel is a life style brand"

If you thought that the "outrage" at Ghostbusters or Oceans 8 was bad, you probably can't imagine what Captain Marvel or Ms. Marvel is going to be like.

I'm grasping for the sliver of hope that Captain Marvel will be an actual film and not an SJW shill

Same

they stand a very small chance of making some of these characters succeed, If they find a competent writer. There are lots of normies watching the movies who don't know of the bs from the comics side

although i have little hope for iron heart, who is coming down the pipeline i heard

I just don't know how they're going to gloss over that girl's origin and call to heroism without completely retconning it.

Disney has a habit of retcon

True

Most of the Milennial generation grew up on completely reworked imaginings of various fairy tales by the company.

I like Disney's 2D animated movies

You know why these failed characters are coming over? Someone high up has looked at recent trends, didn't say "oh, these comics must be shit, let's fix this." They said "oh, no one reads comics anymore, movies are were they are now"

And they think the loudest autistics are the actual readers.

It's the same bs over and over and over again.

Tip: They don't read comics. They just complain and "critique" them.

To be fair, they had massive turnover on the Black Panther movie without it transitioning back into comics. They might think that the identity crap might actually fly there

Political activist hate a medium, they ree on Twitter, out of touch business men go "OMG, everyone is gonna boycott us" and so they hire some of those political activist to "fix" the problem, and that is exactly what they do.... But since the medium is the problem, that means they kill it

The squeaky wheel gets the grease, as the saying goes

@N.Rondain Why would anyone be triggered over Captain Marvel?

Captain marvel looks great

Similar to the talk above about Ironheart, the initial concerns are mostly comics based speculation grounded in how the characters are currently being handled.

If the movies are good, then great. No harm.

Well, they're adapting the original character instead of the Pakistani rip-off

Brie Larson is a great actress

But the directors haven't made any good movies so far...

and having 7 writers isn't a good sign

Yeah, that's the captain marvel movie they're making. I'm reserving judgement until I see a trailer.

There's been talk about making a Kamala movie or episodic series as well.

Ack, seven writers?

A bunch of the writers are producers...

Anna Boden ... (screenplay by)
Liz Flahive ... (screenplay by)
Ryan Fleck ... (screenplay by)
Meg LeFauve ... (screenplay by)
Carly Mensch ... (screenplay by)
Nicole Perlman ... (screenplay by)
Geneva Robertson-Dworet ... (screenplay by)

Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck are the directors as well

Meg LeFauve was a writer on Inside out and The Good Dinosaur

Liz Flahive is a producer

Carly Mensch is also a producer

Nicole Perlman was a writer on the Original Guardians of the galaxy

And the only thing Geneva Robertson-Dworet was a writer on Tomb Raider...

and nothing else

Certainly sounds like a too many cooks situation, but I'll still see how it looks on trailer drop. I feel like there's too many people getting their jimmies pre-rustled over it.

If a movie has more than 4 writers, there's a very high chance of it getting fucked up.

6/7 female writing staff