!agree

Okay, I really feel like trolling really hard this pride

Anyone in Sweden, stockholm, that feels like helping me out?
I got a kekistani flag and I thought, why not put up the kekistani flag over a prideflag somewhere (during night or so)

Wat?

Oh

Only if people know it was me

I mean, the media flipped their shit some years ago when some people wanted those big pride flags but didn't know where to buy them, so they stole from huge flagpoles

Next day it was, according to msm, nazis that stole the flags to dishonor pride or something

What the fuck? Where?

Haven't heard of it

I've seen thsoe x)\

Welp, if anyone in stockholm feels like trolling with me, hit me with that message.
Also, if you have been on sweddit perhaps you've heard of the circus nazi

Youtube have those anti drug campains

I always thought the "this is your brain, this is your brain on drugs" meme came from satire or was satire or so. Then I saw that on youtube xD

Life hack: Use seatbelt as a bottle opener while driving ;-/)

I am currently reading "Das Capital", I have read some other literature from Frederick Engels and probably Marx. I can tell you that if someone only reads "The Communist Manifesto" (I have read it) they have no clue whatsoever about what Marx or Frederick really wanted. For starters "The Communist Manifesto" is short, extremely short, 30 pages (60 but tiny pages and huge text font) and that is a summary of thousands of pages from literature and the impression it gives is pretty horrible. In "The Communist Manifesto" they say "We want to abolish the family", however, it is very out of context. A much better summary in todays world (considering that time periods also give contexts and I have no idea how it was back then) would be "We want all kids, regardless of parents or background, to have the same opportunities".

If you meet someone who likes "The Communist Manifesto" but hasn't read any other literature from Engels or Marx or done research or reading about it, you can almost be 100% that it is a mad/brainwashed person

And what I wrote could be misinterpreted so if you gonna get anything from it then get the point, gonna need to add 1 page of text to make sure there is reasonable little misrepresentation of my example

Sorry for wall of text, have memes

So, anti-vaxxers and that shit might be fake news.
I made a short video about it.

Baisically the conspiracy I might have figured out goes like this (short summary): The anti-vaxxing movement started by companies that make vaccines
Step 1: Start an anti-vax movement by spreading the word as a blogger that no one knows anything about.
Step 2: Some people that did not vaccinate are now gonna justify their decision with the anti-vaxxing movement.
Step 3: Pay media to fear monger about anti-vaxxers
Step 4: People are now willing to get mandatory vaccinations into law.
Step 5: Lobby and make sure even vaccines that not that many take and don't work as good (for example the yearly flu vaccine, it only works about 50%)
Step 6: Extreme profit because now everyone has to get vaccines and more than they got before, the state has to pay so we can come with bullshit reason to increase the prices and people won't complain because the state pays

What made me think of that you ask?

The number that get vaccinated haven't dropped for the past 15 years or so, yet you never heard from the media that people that don't vaccinate are gonna make shit come back

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3d3zawr6f8&feature=youtu.be

I can assure you that I am not romanian, I am a swede

x)

Yes

And sweden has the most retarded combination in welfare. It is private, but funded by government, yet they get a basic income like sum, so we get the worst of state welfare and worst of private

Healthcare worked pretty decent and good a few years back

When it was 100% state, because then we at least got the benefits of state owned healthcare... Instead of only the cons of state and privately owned

Like, all equipment was always in most hospitals

Now, you need to go to a specifik which could be on the other side of the city

And because they get finance from the state, a base sum not just for each patient, and we can all agree that companies are there to make money, they don't need to care about the customers for various reason I can list later, game started

Also, we tax sugar and tobacco enough for it to pay for obesity and smoking related issues so the healthcare system doesn't get nerfed

I don't vaccinate others, I'm not a doctor

Pffft, kommunists are mad, Real marxism is the way to go

Nah, just trolling

I think what Marx really wanted was complete decentralisation, at least that is how he talks in his literature

You know, like who owns linux? Nobody, you could say that the community that uses it owns it

But back in Marxs time everyone either worked on or used everything that was produced

What do you mean "that book"?

He wrote many books, his most famous books "Das Kapital" (because it has 4 volumes that are each at least 500 pages) were his most famous

Why do you ask? Because authority and employers worked to censor, later prevent people from getting them, later it was big news when the poor censored guy released a new book

Well

That is sad, because obviously they haven't read that book then

It literally starts with "I will not go through x in this book series because I have already done that countless of times and in many of my previous books"

Yes

I agree on that

From almost completing the first volume of "Das Kapital", I can assure you he has nothing against the free market

Well, at least not in the first volume, he does mention the free market but only in how it actually fixes value on products and is self regulating

What does purports mean?

Omfg... I hate that book

Worst. Summary. Ever

Baisically, it's like a summary of atheism like this: we want to rid of religioun in politics.
But said in a way that sounds like you want to masacre religious ppl

That is how weird the commie manifesto is written

but it is after all 60 tiny pages with huge text that summarises thousands of thousands of pages from other books

Extremely badly in a sense

If it was to at least explain what it means with a lot of shit, it needs at least 3 a4 pages on each thing

Otherwise you could draw a very weird conclusion compared to the literature

For example: We (communists) want to abolish the family. Now, we do not want to abolish it to remover families altogether, what we want to abolish is the family you (the bourgeois) know of.

People take that out of it's context considering it's time and try to apply it in today, in which case they get the impression that here should be no homeschooling and society is the parents

Read other literature where they, Marx and Engels, talk about the family and what they want to change, they explain some fundamental differences between the working classes families and the bourgeois families

and in short, most the points are that the labourers kids should have equall opportunity as the bourgeois kids

Yes

And considering that time period, the summary I gave wouldn't work

People forget that a different time period must be considered not only as to why something was worded the way it was, but also why it wasn't worded in a, in our time, better way

As you said, ppl are lazy and just read the manifesto

And then someone on top realises if he cherry picks pages from Das Kapital he can get ppl on his side to help him get more power

I've met communists that are like "I have only read some parts of Das Kapital" and coincidentally it os the parts in which the state is the hero and the companies are evil. Never a single part that praises parts of capitalism

Or that distinguishes percieved capitalism from actual capitalism

He does explain how the free market, on the contrary to how it is percieved, is separate from capitalism

Have you heard of a commie that is part of a big commie group ever say anything like that?

They are always against the free market because it is capitalistic (in a russian accent)

You consider me a commie?

Oh, ok

Just checking

I would probably consider myself a Marxist if it wasn't for those that already do. Don't wanna be associated with those shets

I'd say I am a decentralist

I know

The reason real communisms haven't existed is because there has always been a state. They want to rid of the state

But so called communists want to first make the state own EVERYTHING, and then rid of the state. Good luck making someone with all that power give it up

Since cultural cancer came

When both nazis and commies agree on something, you should take it into concideration. Both of them thought that motherhood should be praised, unlike today when it is almost frowned upon. But they did think very differently about the family and other related stuff

Well, with today I mean todays elite

More or less

okay, just to jerk myself off a bit. @Grenade123 here, I told you and everyone here that Marx was probably against centralization and wanted decentralization. Although here he talks against the current capitalist centralisation and gives an example of how centralisation can be done properly.

If you want more context, I'm sorry but citing half a page on phone is kinda too much work to give proper context

??? My image?

Welp, not sure if it glitches or my image won't get uploaded

byt let me cite

Das Kapital volume 1 page 437
"Capital grows in one place to a huge mass in a single hand, because it has in another place been lost by many. This is centralisation proper, as distinct from accumulation and concentration."

Damn... It is hard to cite that book without it being missleading or require trust (my explanation of the context requires you to trust me not only to tell the truth, but also to not have missunderstood it myself) or the actual pages

He still says that centralisation is bad in this case but he differs between centralisation and accumulation as you can see

Well, I quoted Das Kapital, I am not really sure what Marxism is

oh

Trues words have never been spoken. It was after all a kid that said that, so it must be more trustworthy