mudane matt is a bouldering cuk

mudane meth is cool though

He actually boulders?

Ben Shapiro here, Palestine should be taken over

thats pretty neat

How do I all these boulders?!

I accidentally the whole boulders

Man, I'd really like to give Tim a Link to Thomas Sowell at Fireling Line. From the early 80s....

FUCK YOU ACCIDENTLY THE WHOLE THING ?!?!?!

*Thomas Sowell debunked the Gender Wage Gap almost 40 years ago!!!*

anti-SJW detected ^

Also a minority

I like listening to Shapiro because he brings up positions I disagree with

I used to listen to shapiro a lot more

i dont hate the guy though he makes good points

I don't like how anti-Trump he is.

But he has good points.

Yes, in Case of SJW Ben Shapiro is good, in case of Trump he sucks and Andrew K. is way better.

Creative, he is not that anti trump - he seems likely to vote for trump in 2020 and has said so himself

but none of his criticism of trump is not fair IMO

He's not that anti-trump but he makes a mountain out of a molehill sometimes

Not as much anymore but he was far worse in the past.

yeah - that he does

Creative, ture

his stance on trans people makes me hard

He's one of those people who have to preface things with "I don't like Trump but".

Creative, well I'm also one of those people 😉

I doubt Shapiro is controlled opposition, but he's definitely a paleo-con who has not adapted to the new political reality.

Creative, I don't like trump ... but I hate democrats more 😃

> Sometimes

He's one of those guys who would rather lose than compromise slightly on religious stances or 'civility'.

```Creative, he is not that anti trump - he seems likely to vote for trump in 2020 and has said so himself```
Wait how he will bash Trump when he tells Benjamin NO

Because he doesn't think losing is a big deal.

Atkins have you seen his discussions with Sam harris?

You don't have to like the guy but it annoys me when people have to say that so they don't get attacked instantly. Just say what you think.

Atkins, I think principles are more important than winning also

Shapiro seems to think that losing to the democrats is just a minor annoyance that has little to no affect on his life, livelihood, or future.

Atkins, you have a point there I guess

he was right in the past but right now he ie dead wrong

if the Dems win now its over for you in the US and the Dems will implement Censoring EU Style

I used to think like Shapiro actually.

Stefan, true

no you make good points - in this climate - winning matters

But that's because I didn't realize how far down the path of political decay the US was.

If this was 20-30 years ago Shapiro would be right.

but it's not.

if the dems implement censoring EU style im gonna fucking buy a gun

Hence the term paleo-con

but I dunno - I don't hold Shapiros insistence on principles against him - but I think it is important to recognize winning matters

I think part of Shapiro's stance might also be due to the fact that he's very well off financially and has plenty of fall-back options. He can go back into law. He can write books. If shit gets really bad he can just say "fuck it" and go to Israel.

The reality of the situation is that if we lose to the left we lose America.

So he's not desperate enough to reevaluate his stance.

no, because Ben doesn't really care about the US

Most people on the right don't have those fall-back options. Some working class joe working in a machine shop or a guy working in an office trying to keep his head down doesn't have anywhere left to retreat.

I wouldn't say he doesn't care. Just that he feels safe in his position.

Ben can go to Israel anytime if its getting to bad in the US

If you feel safe, why change?

Stefan, if USA goes far left - Isreal is in dire straights

Well, that's not an optimal situation for anyone. Israel depends on the US in a lot of ways.

Anyway, I agree with Styx for most parts.

the joos need merica

even though his channel is Censored in Germany.

So it's in his best interest regardless to protect and preserve the US.

Styx ?

But he probably doesn't feel the same level of risk and desperation as some middle class American conservative.

Styxhexenhammer666 aka Hippie-Anarcho Jesus.

Who still doesn't know 'Styx' in 2018?

ah that guy

__

styx is smart ..... i think

👈 this guy

>spoon clank

10.2

Styx got the Chemnitz Riot right!

the blue wave is coming bois

Though he fucked up pronounching Chemnitz ^^

@Rabbi Shekels The more you talk about it, the better!

The next two months are going to be wild.

Styx's discussion of the pronunciation of 'Chemnitz' was hilarious.

@Stefan Payne fuck ... the dems are trying for th trump effect

so y'all from USA?

Ocasio Cortez

Need to say more?

and that idiot isn't even voted into office

AOC is an imbecile.

I'd really die laughing if she looses in the election

Yea, from US

subverse was denid for the uoutube partner program

they said our content was not appropriate

Stefan, that would be so perfect

@Timcast Have you watched Thomas Sowell on Firing Line?

Wait, what? How, did they give any example or such @Timcast

Why do you need the YouTube Partner Program again?

and well, was to be expected, sadly.

i assume that's all the xplanation you got right ?

As for Thomas Sowell at Firing Line: He debunked the Gender Wage Gap pretty well - almost 40 Years ago. One of the best Minds America had this century.

yeah

that was genius

Stefan, yeah he is a pretty clever guy

they claim we are just a duplicate channel of stolen content

and not just the gender wage gap

uh...

Yeah, it was hillarious, already watched it twice and still like the discussion.

Oof, that’s a strange hill to take then.

Tim, it must be some SJW sitting there figuring they will just make up shit because nobody will check them on it

yup

this is why

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pf5fAiXYr08

they denied you tim cuz your competing against the MSM

Is this YouTube Partner Program worth real money? I think lots of us want to divest from the YouTube economy (especially SuperChats).

don't want facts crowding their platform

Was it automated or manual?

Don't you guys think...

The white devil is terrible?

Wait, this isnt any form of dupe though

@Scribblehatch is a BLM supporter

if that video was monetized itd be like 500$

it cost us waaaaaaaay more to make that

like a couple thousand

5 c-notes?!

@Scribblehatch I think it's OK to be white.

so its nice to make some back

I think the total trip was like 3 grand to go there and do all that work

Ideally this is what patreon was made for.

But wow have they screwed the pooch.

exactly

@Timcast Why isn't gab.ai/Timcast Premium? I'd subscribe right now.

so my main channel is funding subverse basically

Tim, well we really appericate your work - all of it

Patreon fell for the classic, classic mistake.

I hate Patreon.

"We uh, we find loli and bestiality illustrations to be harmful--" And congratulations Patreon. You've become basic bitch #8522.

I cancelled all my Patreon pledges after Patreon banned Faith Goldy.

That's just how quickly you lose the point of yourself.

"But it's just loli and bestiality" But it's just a dead canary in a coalmine.

Get back to work miners. We have coal to mine here. Honestly. What's the fuss about

Just a dead bird.

loli

lulzi

lolzi

dont blanme aptreon

patreon

i know jack is lefty but hes not the problem

I know, stripe too.

its mastercard

visa

Credit card companies.

and stripe

they are doing the same to everyone

makersupport got hit

they all do

They should recall what country they're based in, and fuck off.

and patreon was able to survive

See Robert Spencer!

exactly

I was ready to cut up my MasterCard after what they did to Robert Spencer and David Horowitz.

wait whats happened?

Yea, stuff is getting fucked up

there was a guy that got the ban reversed from patrean

Patreon should have at least been more vocal behind it

"I HAVE STRINGS. LOOK UP TO WHERE THEY LEAAAAAAD!!"

so much for country based laws when you deal with international companies

@Lagomaster24 Master Card preassured Patreon to kick Robert Spencer off the Plattform.
And did the same for David Horowitz. Though Horowitz is back, SPencer is not.

oh

this ^

Patreon was honest **recently.**

Speaking of Stripe... <https://twitter.com/jaredlholt/status/1034453285846040578>

They should've been honest **sooner.**

I thought something happened to Tim

MakerSupport might've actually been an bitcoin investment scam. Either way the creators I gave pledges on MakerSupport got ripped off.

that spencer was kicked off:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c8/Robert_Spencer.jpg/220px-Robert_Spencer.jpg

Not that spencer:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7b/Richard_b_spencer_cropped_retouched.jpg/220px-Richard_b_spencer_cropped_retouched.jpg

Yea, Tim can’t commission anymore of his waifus from his patreon pledges.

Lango, Tim's subverse channel was denied for youtube partnership program

Wouldn't it be funny if the second after Jared Holt posted that, and got up off his chair, his foot immediately triggered a beartrap.

i need several waifus

ah ok

thats dumb

I require at least three fluid ounces of waifu

fluid

i only need one

Neither Spencer deserves to be deplatformed for their political opinions.

the subverse video that was there is now gone https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRqe1dIzrAA&feature=youtu.be

Imagine if everytime anyone suggested curtailing another person's freedom, their foot finds a beartrap.

☺

Thing is that Robert is the "Islamophob" that educates about Islam....
That's worse than Richard....

More people probably want to murder Robert Spencer than Richard Spencer.

@xaivei What video was it..?

True

You would have a bear trap then because that is curtailing others the right to curtail freedoms @Scribblehatch

Miss, it was about gender wage gap

Nah nah.

That would be just plain silly.

I think

buit now it's gone

Don't pitch such silly hypothetical scenarios at me, sir.

They have to be rooted in logic.

Your right, better get back to work on bear trap deployment systems.

In response to the Wil Wheaton vid the left wants to censor what they don't like but force you to see the things they do like. That's why they can block you but you can't block them.

Its funny

I drool in anticipation of the day they have all the power they've shown themselves to deserve.

You shouldn’t drool, it’s messy. Keep it to a salivate

Oh dear, that other Wheaton Video is amazing

How did Wheaton's law ever get to be a thing?

oh and btw: Cats >>>>>>>> Dogs

"don't be a dick" Wow what a stunning order of words.

Bold. Innovative. Different..

Really makes you think.

Is it allowed to have a dick?

@Timcast Quick question, I just want to know your opinion. Do you think re-electing Trump and giving Republicans full control will be beneficial as long as they keep doing what they are doing? Or Should we focus on getting someone else in White House, while aiming for a bipartisan congress and house? Or should allow Democrats back in?

is it ever really bipartisan?

I'm leaning to letting Republicans control house, congress, and white house as long as they keep doing what they are doing now.

Bipartisan means both democrats and republicans working together in house and congress.

Mark, there certainly are better options for president than trump - but the question is could they win

and who are they 😉

nobody agrees

I don't see any options better than Trump. He has done more than any president in my history and I am 33 years old.

Mark, I don't think we will see democrats and republicans working together again for some time

Mark, not more so than now

I'm all for Republicans having control under Trump.

"Democrats Just Confirmed Lots Of Trump’s Judges So They Could Skip Town" - https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/senate-democrats-trump-federal-judges_us_5b86c0eee4b0cf7b00313783?utm_source=reddit.com

They been keeping their campaign promises and working hard to completing them. That is why I like this administration so far. They are also removing harmful policies put in place by Democrats and Rino republicans.

Mark, I'm not a USian - but I dunno - trump is okay - certainly I can't stand the democrats

@xaivei dems not blocking Trump judges seems weird to me

Atkins yeah they don't really care - they would get confirmed eventually

Atkins, I think they can just delay, not block indefinately

but not 100%

The dems have been wielding SO MUCH power through federal judges that just giving up those positions without a fight makes my spidey sense tingle.

I'm pretty sure they have no power to block Kavenaugh

They don't, but they can drag out the process for a long time.

Long enough for more injunctions, etc.

Democrats are power hungry.

Like look how much power they were able to wield through blocking Trump's travel bans and policy changes on the border.

They don't care about the citizens.

Atkins - not that sure they can do it for Kavenaugh - if republicans have the votes I think they can confirm - like they did with Gorsuch - but again not 100%

Trying too hard to drag out confirmations will just get Senate rules overturned.

Aren't they still trying to force the retention of DACA through the federal judiciary?

Man, Moral Dilemma. I would explain situation for the man who is falsely accused and then ask him what he wants, then I would take into consideration how bad the charges before I decide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqcA4AxiavQ

Mark, republicans are also power hungry - it is just I think personally what Republicans do with their power is not as bad as what dems do with their power

The federal judiciary is in need of a massive smackdown.

If the 10 who are guilty have series crimes, I would keep innocent man in prison. But if the crimes are not very bad, I would release the man.

Mostly because of democrat judges.

The ninth circuit is overruled almost 90% of the time.

I would explain it to the man... so he understands, then have him released on good behavior later and afterwards clear his record.

The Ninth Circuit needs to be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

Mark, you know the quote from Thomas Jefferson?

My big fear is that the democrats are going to stump for this idea of 'annulment', in which case judicial appointments would be annulled as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_formulation

oh no it is not quote from jefferso

There's no such thing as 'annulment', unless you mean Trump annulling Obama's legacy of EO's.

though I'm sure he said it