I'm leaning to letting Republicans control house, congress, and white house as long as they keep doing what they are doing now.

Bipartisan means both democrats and republicans working together in house and congress.

Mark, there certainly are better options for president than trump - but the question is could they win

and who are they 😉

nobody agrees

I don't see any options better than Trump. He has done more than any president in my history and I am 33 years old.

Mark, I don't think we will see democrats and republicans working together again for some time

Mark, not more so than now

I'm all for Republicans having control under Trump.

"Democrats Just Confirmed Lots Of Trump’s Judges So They Could Skip Town" - https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/senate-democrats-trump-federal-judges_us_5b86c0eee4b0cf7b00313783?utm_source=reddit.com

They been keeping their campaign promises and working hard to completing them. That is why I like this administration so far. They are also removing harmful policies put in place by Democrats and Rino republicans.

Mark, I'm not a USian - but I dunno - trump is okay - certainly I can't stand the democrats

@xaivei dems not blocking Trump judges seems weird to me

Atkins yeah they don't really care - they would get confirmed eventually

Atkins, I think they can just delay, not block indefinately

but not 100%

The dems have been wielding SO MUCH power through federal judges that just giving up those positions without a fight makes my spidey sense tingle.

I'm pretty sure they have no power to block Kavenaugh

They don't, but they can drag out the process for a long time.

Long enough for more injunctions, etc.

Democrats are power hungry.

Like look how much power they were able to wield through blocking Trump's travel bans and policy changes on the border.

They don't care about the citizens.

Atkins - not that sure they can do it for Kavenaugh - if republicans have the votes I think they can confirm - like they did with Gorsuch - but again not 100%

Trying too hard to drag out confirmations will just get Senate rules overturned.

Aren't they still trying to force the retention of DACA through the federal judiciary?

Man, Moral Dilemma. I would explain situation for the man who is falsely accused and then ask him what he wants, then I would take into consideration how bad the charges before I decide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqcA4AxiavQ

Mark, republicans are also power hungry - it is just I think personally what Republicans do with their power is not as bad as what dems do with their power

The federal judiciary is in need of a massive smackdown.

If the 10 who are guilty have series crimes, I would keep innocent man in prison. But if the crimes are not very bad, I would release the man.

Mostly because of democrat judges.

The ninth circuit is overruled almost 90% of the time.

I would explain it to the man... so he understands, then have him released on good behavior later and afterwards clear his record.

The Ninth Circuit needs to be nuked from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

Mark, you know the quote from Thomas Jefferson?

My big fear is that the democrats are going to stump for this idea of 'annulment', in which case judicial appointments would be annulled as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone%27s_formulation

oh no it is not quote from jefferso

There's no such thing as 'annulment', unless you mean Trump annulling Obama's legacy of EO's.

though I'm sure he said it

The innocent man I would give him a light sentence, like 1 year prison time, then release him on good behavior in month and half before clearing his record.. As for the 10 who are guilty, I would punish them with the full book.