⚔—debate-3—
Discord ID: 785907471540813915
2,308 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/24
| Next
Yes.
Unless a miscarriage
But that’s a different discussion
What's even the point of saying this? I am arguing that on its own the fetus is as good as dead before a heartbeat
No it's not
Without the mother. Without chemo, many people are good as dead. Should we just kill ‘em now, because they rely on something else to live?
Once the zygote has implanted itself on the uterine wall it is a separate living being
Right. Has an individual genetic code.
There is a difference b/w helped stay alive and becoming alive
By which definition?
It has become alive at fertilization
Then after wards relies on the mother
By science
Its chromosomes have been formed
From there it grows into a separate human with its own individual characteristics
Not really, with your logic. It’s alive at the moment of fertilization, as @Creampie said.
Lol
Scientists haven't come to a conclusion yet
Sure they have
Yeah they have.
It's nothing to find out it's a known fact
It's already been determined
See point is, before a heartbeat, the fetus is a collection of cells. And you can argue that it has the potential to grow, but that potential can't be achieved without the mother. Put the fetus out of the womb it's dead
This is my logic
They have not
It is a collection of separate living cells
That's not how you define alive
Okay. Like I’ve said, should people who rely on machinery for life be considered dead, because without it they won’t survive?
Yes the mother is needed but that's because that's how reproduction works
How do you define alive?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713799/%23:~:text%3DAccording%2520to%2520them%252C%2520the%2520fetus,or%2520more%2520as%2520human%2520being.&ved=2ahUKEwjNlP7Nl8btAhUszTgGHbEqCmYQFjABegQIAhAE&usg=AOvVaw1xGrGHBTr__jznZe8OJ0fn
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.bbc.com/ethics/abortion/child/alive_1.shtml&ved=2ahUKEwjNlP7Nl8btAhUszTgGHbEqCmYQFjAIegQIFRAB&usg=AOvVaw0_4W-a1fQW4fFAFEILbEY7
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.bbc.com/ethics/abortion/child/alive_1.shtml&ved=2ahUKEwjNlP7Nl8btAhUszTgGHbEqCmYQFjAIegQIFRAB&usg=AOvVaw0_4W-a1fQW4fFAFEILbEY7
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.wired.com/2015/10/science-cant-say-babys-life-begins/amp&ved=2ahUKEwjNlP7Nl8btAhUszTgGHbEqCmYQFjAJegQIFxAB&usg=AOvVaw2RRXedPrgvNFOeJwwDcfhq&cf=1
Yes. It is. Plants are alive. But once again, no potential to become human.
And, the sentence would be “That’s not how *I* define alive”
Well the point of, people on machineries after birth ARE alive. Their brain functions, they respond to stimuli and stuff like that. A fetus before a heartbeat dosent
This is how I define it.
People who are in commas don’t, either.
I am trying to read them stop messaging me
You can't argue that a person before going into a coma didn't show these qualities
https://www.khanacademy.org/science/high-school-biology/hs-biology-foundations/hs-biology-and-the-scientific-method/a/what-is-life
And if someone has a heart attack, their heart isn’t beating.. but there is still an effort to keep them alive. Or bring them back.
Well yes. It's called a vegetative state. But we know for sure that they were alive BEFORE the attack
Yeah, and biology shows that an infant is alive before a heartbeat
Bruh..I sent 4 links
Read them
I did
Wdym where?
Like if you pull up your profile
It says pro life and pro abortion
Yeah
?
That's how this whole convo began
Dude you couldn't even scroll up *sigh*
Ok so I will say it again
That's a but much lol
I think abortion is ok till the fetus isint alive, which imo, is the point till which it gets a heart beat
Which is 18 weeks right?
No
Near 10
On avg
10 weeks?
What about the rest of it, is the heart beat the only thing that matters ?
It’s actually 6-8
Ig
Not “ig”. I’ve done research.. It’s on average 6-8.
Well by definition. I think that makes it clearly alive. I would prefer something like brain activity, but that's very hard to judge
That's sad
I don't care
That's the point at which
It has a right to life
But it has a right to life once it is fertilized
Last time I checked, right to life is for alive people
IT IS ALIVE
The whole argument I gave is that, it isint
<:bruh:766661313912242187>
Every cell in your body is alive, it might not have a heart beat but it's alive
It functions
Exactly
It achieves things
That's not how you define it....
Then how do you define it?
What else do you need
You like running around in circles?
Correction: that *is* how she defines it. It isn’t how *you* define it.
Yeah
True
Everything is subjective to one's own opinion
You realize that even if you may not consider it alive, it’s human.
@Creampie your opinions will never achieve peace b/w liberals and conservatives.
Legalising to till the heartbeat would reduce abortions by a lot, give leeway in case if rapes, and is morally and technically strong enough to have its merit. Your choice. This same meaningless debate till the end of time while children keep getting killed. Or something practical which is going to help your cause a lot.
And a 8 week abortion is nowhere as brutal as the 22 week one
And I am not saying this because I have formed that opinion out of desperation, I truly believe in it
However these are it's secondary benifits
Anyways gtg
No an 8 week abortion is not near as brutal but its still abortion it doesn't change that
Well thank you for defending your views
I only care about right to life
Have a wonderful day
Me too
Tq
Opinions on the vaccine?
2,308 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 2/24
| Next