Message from @Madcat
Discord ID: 491980494276395008
Doesn't matter who they choose.
Idk you’d think when the metoo thing came out they would’ve jumped on the chance to accuse someone who did that to them
But then you wait months or even years
Mattress lady funny
thats a good point
hadnt thougth bout the metoo thing
been going on for a few years, why not then
GOP just needs to refuse to play an image game with rules created by the Dem-aligned leftist media.
Yeah they can easily make up a accusation. If we keep people from being nominated because they been accused. It would make it easier for the left to make false accusations to keep whoever they hate from being nominated. Even if they are proven innocent later, they are denied the nomination and have their life being ripped apart by rabbit mobs.
Republican president: "I nominate John Smith for the Supreme Court"
Leftist activist: "He raped me 30 years ago. I don't remember when or where, nor do I have any witnesses or a police report"
That can happen for fucking anybody.
ya i do understand the point you all are making
Dems and her friends: “I agree, and I think we should take her word for it because other people that may not be reliable sources think it’s quite possible.”
I think its a bad move by the leftist to do this now when kav gets put in the chair he gonna roe v wade their asses
you dont have to keep trying to beat it like a dead horse, im just trying to think of other options is all i am doing
It is innocent until proven guilty, not guilty till proven innocent.
If Flake is now ready to vote to confirm Kavanaugh then this smear job is officially over.
Media: “here’s some pictures from his university days, and she went to university. But we’re not going to show you pictures or tell you how far away their colleges are.”
They are 7 miles apart RO.
contro, the Dems are completely incapable of good-faith politics right now.
@Timcast Just wanted to say, just started watching your stuff and I applaud you for not falling in with the mobs on both sides and actually approaching things intelligently
I found that information with an simple google search regarding his past and google maps.
Oh okay, 7 miles okay okay
So you can assume parties I guess
But they didn’t show any photos of him, but said stuff from his yearbooks
Hey I think her accusation is full of shit due to discrepancies in her story. I won't try to spin things to suit my view though.
Assuming someone's lying doesn't line up with "innocent until proven guilty," either.
If he is guilty, then let him face justice. If he isn't, don't destroy his life.
^^
i will never disagree with that at all mark
I do
Pineapple juice
>2018
Top tier guardian content
We must reserve judgement till the facts and evidence comes out. If we have evidence that she is lying, then the DNC should apologize and he should be fast tracked to nomination. If he is guilty, they must remove him from nomination and place him within jail.
That is the way I look at it.
Wh--
Facing justice means dropping it because it allegedly happened 36 years ago.
What the fuck?