Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 493784032409288715
Not gore its food
It may look like gore but it def food
I wouldnt eat though
Bye bye image
🤔
Wtf is this twitter who deleting pics
They bowstte shit is outa control
Bowsette is actually a very interesting case study for the internet world
its popularity shows that
- Many people would ship Mario and Bowsers bro-mance
- They're okay with transexual if theres an authentic transform by magic, not just looks
- People still want big titty goth gf's
- Anime culture finds a way to survive
"You might not know what linux is" - laughed way to hard at that
But do you really know what it is?
😄
inb4
"Who is Linux?" becomes a CNN quote
He is a friend of the pervasive hacker known as 4chan of course
<:TimThink:482277772497125378>
In any case i dont believe you can recind your license.
Its been published under that license, that publication can be used under that license, period.
Also, "turning over your copyright" is legaly impossible
Copyright is not transferable
well you can give them a legal contract saying essentially "I the copyright holder, give full rights to use and redistribute my ware to party X"
right
but you still hold the copyright
yeah, but you give them the right to use it unconditionally 😛
yes
so instead of having to say "The copyright holder, who is the one true holder of the copyright, gives this group a legal ticket to use the copyrightable material for their own benefit and redistribute it as they see fit, without having to worry about the copyright because this ticket gives them the right to use the copyright"
Its just "they gave the copyright to X"
its shorthand
Eat the ticket
absorb its legally binding powers? <:TimThink:482277772497125378>
Well you can say "i licensed my material to X"
Absorb its nutrients
The ownership is now bodily bound
I believe the licensing would refer to that instance of the copyrightable material
So like, if you'd lisence version 1
You don't have to give them the right to use version 1.01
like how you can be licensed to use Word 2003, but not be entitled to version 2013 😛
Well if you develop version 1.01 yourself you may technicly hold a new copyright to the changed code anyways.
yeah, but you can then only publish the changes, not the changes + original material
a "mod" for the software so to say :p
I agree