Life has the value of your heart,

If you value it, it has value for you,

That doesn't mean i share that value if i dont care

Lol xorgy you crack me up

I don't trust your average person to take out the trash much less decide whether a fetus is a person.

I'm neither honestly, because I don't think I understand the moral calculus going on there.

Which is why honestly the laws in place don't bother me, neither do the ones that were in place in the '70s.

Again

what if someone else values your fetus, as a human life from the perspective of their religion for example

does that someone else rise the kid?

I would tend to favour the answer which causes fewer criminal trials.

then they can put their money where their values are,

Thats why its a "VALUE" 😛

People pay good money to adopt a kid

but why should that start at conception, or at birth?

Or to buy a kid.

I think veganism and pro life should be a package deal. Either both, or neither.

Seems ritually arbitrary.

Yeah probably WT

off to catch the rapists like

I'm in that abortion category where i'm pro-choice, but i'm like, last resort so that if you have to i'm like: "duuuude, why you doin' this to all of us with your recklessness"

If we made selling babies legal there'd be less abortion but as it is people go to other countries to adopt

I'm just a callous asshole tho

I don't care about the lives or problems of people I don't know

I think only doctors should be qualified to make the "choice"

"Do no harm" should cover babies

I think if we abort the child we should also abort the mother.

doctors don't get that decision, I dont want someone else to decide for me

"safe, legal, and rare" seems to be shifting to "safe and legal" (though the number of abortions is declining, because the number of conceptions is declining)

<:blobhyperthinkfast:396521401840041985>

Save, legal and regular if the Dems are anything to go by <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8J74lmbc-U

Though you have to ask yourself: why do we prosecute the murder of a person nobody knows or likes?

to draw a central line, else we get mob-rule

else you get: "Lefties don't like righties, so they're okay with murdering them, Righties don't like lefties, so they're okay with murdering them"

and since those big groups don't know much on the other side due to purity/partizanship

If you think your enemy should get the guillotine or the helicopter there's no reason for them not to think the same of you

that would mean you're free to kill the other tribesmen

The Detroit answer seems to be "we don't _even investigate_" (_added_)

But heh.

In that case, might makes right.

"we can't" seems more realistic, they got more crime than they can deal with

I'm all about it

If I kill all of my enemies, they'll be no one left to accuse me of genocide.