Seems ritually arbitrary.

Yeah probably WT

off to catch the rapists like

I'm in that abortion category where i'm pro-choice, but i'm like, last resort so that if you have to i'm like: "duuuude, why you doin' this to all of us with your recklessness"

If we made selling babies legal there'd be less abortion but as it is people go to other countries to adopt

I'm just a callous asshole tho

I don't care about the lives or problems of people I don't know

I think only doctors should be qualified to make the "choice"

"Do no harm" should cover babies

I think if we abort the child we should also abort the mother.

doctors don't get that decision, I dont want someone else to decide for me

"safe, legal, and rare" seems to be shifting to "safe and legal" (though the number of abortions is declining, because the number of conceptions is declining)

<:blobhyperthinkfast:396521401840041985>

Save, legal and regular if the Dems are anything to go by <:TimThink:482277772497125378>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8J74lmbc-U

Though you have to ask yourself: why do we prosecute the murder of a person nobody knows or likes?

to draw a central line, else we get mob-rule

else you get: "Lefties don't like righties, so they're okay with murdering them, Righties don't like lefties, so they're okay with murdering them"

and since those big groups don't know much on the other side due to purity/partizanship

If you think your enemy should get the guillotine or the helicopter there's no reason for them not to think the same of you

that would mean you're free to kill the other tribesmen

The Detroit answer seems to be "we don't _even investigate_" (_added_)

But heh.

In that case, might makes right.

"we can't" seems more realistic, they got more crime than they can deal with

I'm all about it

If I kill all of my enemies, they'll be no one left to accuse me of genocide.

<:blobhyperthinkfast:396521401840041985>

Still

dont forget

Ideally we shouldn't be having tribal battles over partisanship, but rather, society should be a balance of progress vs conservation

If you kill your enemies, THEY WIN

It's often not the case that there's "more crime" than we can deal with.

Some crimes are just too difficult to investigate, but that's a different matter.

In some places, we get one murder, and nobody actually cares, but the law is enforced.

But right now progress is just a dogwhistle that you're part of the Not Sexist Not Racist Crew

I mean, the obvious answer is that there's something about people who are willing to unlawfully kill, in general, which seems dubious to us.

I think that's a fair distinction.

progress right now just buys you more sand for your hourglass in the purity-spiral

And maybe that's what makes abortion okay: if somebody is willing to kill but not willing to think of it as killing, then maybe it's okay?

theres a difference