Message from @donborvio
Discord ID: 685755216410574869
race hate is now according to how anyone interprets something
yeah, total BS, but hold them to their own standards
<:priti:655131018789126154>
> At around 8.20pm on Wednesday, March 4, a 19-year-old Chinese university student was approached by four unknown white men, thought to be in their 20s, on Castle Street and subsequently told “go back to your own country – you must have coronavirus”.
>
> The men proceeded to punch, kick and spit at the teenager, stole his cap and threatened him with a knife.
did they tell him this is maga country
Boris Britain everyone
its good that they specified WHITE MEN, if it was anyone else it would just be 'men'
Probably made up tbh
more blood libel for whitoids
Did they go for a coffee after?
Hope the Chinese guy didn't drop his sub
the bbc actually ran a deplatforming story
TRIGGER WARNING
- 1st 5 mins - how perfect Pakistani Muslim life is
- 2nd 5 mins - how evil white islamophobes are (and how the police turn a blind eye)
- closing diatribe about how Indians built Britain
...and of course, no mention of Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs...
https://youtu.be/Lzz50xENH4g
this has probably already been spoken about but https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-51751915
```Around 39% of people in the US, which is yet to have a female president, thought men made better leaders.```
@donborvio there’s no victimhood in that
yep
Yet they block Tulsi from the debates because she'd fry them now
though she's the only Dem that the center-right would support
That's such an ambiguous question
They don't specify if people thought men made better leaders because they are men or just because men on average made better leaders.
Tulsi is the only candidate who would be willing to compromise
Bernie won’t accept anything less than free shit for everyone
And Biden will be shitting himself in a retirement home by the time Inauguration Day comes around
I’m starting to wish the we lost to the revolutionary war
because i'm completely Geoffrey Archered right now can someone work out the actual per capita of this taking into account population stats x https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/white-people-terror-offences-number-ethnic-group-asian-home-office-a9376846.html
I'm actually skeptical of the data, because they probably count tweet arrests as "terrorism". Or "throw bacon at mosque".
regardless the difference is 1% 😆
While not counting organized racial child rape
```Raffaello Pantucci, the director of international security studies at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), said white suspects would include far-right extremists, Muslim converts and people of “mixed or unclear” ideology.```
Read it.
but even using their definition with a difference of 1%. While at a guess white people make up 80%+ and Asians will make up less than 10%
of the population
I wonder how many nonwhites are lumped in into the convert group to make it look worse.
they do clearly define that in the study