Message from @Abel
Discord ID: 508174509925203978
oh, that's for a murder. forget about that.
The BDSM case came up on the TFM show ... still looking.
I can't find the case right now. I have to find the TFM episode.
I'll try to find other cases of revoked consent.
But as a general rule, judges seem to agree that even written consent forms are not enough necessarily to exonerate you.
this seems like high quality <#398973785426100234> material
lol
Naw man, it's complex philosophy
super legit
Sowell kind of defends Marx a little bit, because he says that he has just been misinterpreted.
However, that could be a leftover of Sowell's Marxist days.
@Termer a shit one though
muh group
lel
@R9b1t thanks for the ricardo post I have channel dedicated to him
Welp, that's gonna be a problem for the narrative
https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1058421357153787906?s=19
Tim: "The Left can't meme."
Blue-Checks: "Mean? We can mean real good, see?"
Blue-Checks: *Insult Tim on Twitter*
*facepalm*
Were you expecting a joke or reasoned response from them? While there are plenty of liberals who still act rationally and can genuinely give reasoned response or maybe even laugh at the memes as well, blue check marks tends **Not** to be those people
thats like jews saying they are white when they do something bad🤔
Wait ... so on one hand black people are punished more harshly by the justice system - on the other hand people pretend to be black to ... smear black people? What?
Wekcine 2 2019
Nothing about social justice BS makes any sense.
SJW makes sense if you understand their goals and way of thinking.
but you cant find any consistent logic behind it.
like debating SJWs is really easy if your goal is to show their hypocricy.
And use their flawed way of thinking against them.
but there is no way of chaning their way of thinking or getting them to admit they are wrong or they dont have any logic behind their thinking.
2 years ago or so I didn't know anything about Black People.
Now I really do no like black people.
Is project veritas credible?
Welll, its undercover journalism....
Well, depends on whether you feel their recording are purposefully edited to misrepresent people
I would say its credible, but biased
So far, they seem credible, but partisan
@Stratowolf credible? Yes for the most part I have found them to be decently credible.
Hyper partisan? Double yes.
Their best aspect is that most of their stuff simply cannot be proven wrong
Unless every single person records their private conversations
```Well, depends on whether you feel their recording are purposefully edited to misrepresent people```
Well, its not even that badly edited, as they usually let the whole conversation leading up to that happen.
Did you see the one about beto?
Nope, but I don't doubt that the Dems are full of shit and your version of our Angie M.
every single one of them
Beto is spending campaign money on the caravan apparently