Message from @Eccles
Discord ID: 685275671194632328
<:tiptip:462282246695419934>
i have the sense to not get too worked up about things i cannot change
So no politics for you
unlike most that think just cause they SAY something means something
^
Lmao.
That's a good policy, Eccles
@ManAnimal if good meant pitiful
i can talk politics, xav, but it'll only be my opinion and personal justification
we all have limits
you can do ANYTHING... but not EVERYTHING
I can even do absolutely nothing
Clearly, not doing something is as valid as doing something.
As evidenced by... all the folks that do fuck all...
I call abstaining 'option No. 3'
systems and people only have legitimacy if you are actively participating
as long as the elite turn the Left and Right against each other, they are winning
but if people refuse to argue over bullshit..
and if you turn against the elite because they're elite, you're a communist
Not if they're traitors tho??
values
What if all ideologies are just projections of inner psychology, reflected in groups largely because the people within those groups relatively share the same psychology?
That ideologies are little more than codifications of ideas that tick all the right boxes in your personal psychology I mean.
then you need to come up with a working model that allows these groups to co-exist without killing or enslaving each other
on it bth
it's a working theory
but what do people think? I've been stewing on it for a while
may as well put the rod out somewhere
what is a "person psychology"
personal psychology?
literally just the way **you** think
what do you think informs the way people think?
for example, Jung would boil it down to basic archetypes
I think it's rooted in biology but can be shaped socially
like a plant in a pot
but aren't basic archetypes just stereotypes? templates, a generalisation
If you plant a greenleaf seed it'll be a greenleaf plant when it grows, but you can control *how* it grows
sort of
Late night tv and your degree of skepticism thereof
zero = leftist