That's a good policy, Eccles

@ManAnimal if good meant pitiful

i can talk politics, xav, but it'll only be my opinion and personal justification

we all have limits

you can do ANYTHING... but not EVERYTHING

I can even do absolutely nothing

Clearly, not doing something is as valid as doing something.
As evidenced by... all the folks that do fuck all...

https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/recovered-coronavirus-patient-dies-in-china-amid-reports-of-survivors-falling-ill-again-c-732400

I call abstaining 'option No. 3'

systems and people only have legitimacy if you are actively participating

as long as the elite turn the Left and Right against each other, they are winning

but if people refuse to argue over bullshit..

and if you turn against the elite because they're elite, you're a communist

Not if they're traitors tho??

then go after people because they're traitors, not because they're left, right, or elite

values

What if all ideologies are just projections of inner psychology, reflected in groups largely because the people within those groups relatively share the same psychology?

That ideologies are little more than codifications of ideas that tick all the right boxes in your personal psychology I mean.

then you need to come up with a working model that allows these groups to co-exist without killing or enslaving each other

on it bth

it's a working theory

but what do people think? I've been stewing on it for a while

may as well put the rod out somewhere

what is a "person psychology"

personal psychology?

literally just the way **you** think

what do you think informs the way people think?

for example, Jung would boil it down to basic archetypes

I think it's rooted in biology but can be shaped socially

like a plant in a pot

but aren't basic archetypes just stereotypes? templates, a generalisation

If you plant a greenleaf seed it'll be a greenleaf plant when it grows, but you can control *how* it grows

sort of

Late night tv and your degree of skepticism thereof

zero = leftist

100% = sane

But there's many psychologists who have different models for interpreting how people think

I'm pretty much going to research all of them eventually

try to make cross sections out of working models

then craete my own

re-cross section