Message from @Atkins
Discord ID: 514138305630175242
Name calling hasn't helped the socialists, so why would it help against them?
because emotional BS won't work against logical beings, and only emotional BS back can be understood by them
Radical alt centrists rise up
the left literally cannot understand reason so only name calling and emotional BS can be understood by the progressive npcs
got to speak in their native programming language, lol
ridicule has proven a very effective weapon. it's an area weapon though. can't easily be used against point targets.
i mean, hillary had to reference pepe the frog in a speech because it was bothering her followers so much
to me when someone starts to attack you personally/name calling/etc... they've already lost the debate....
ridicule doesn't have to be directed against individuals
normally yes, but if the people you talk to are only able to communicate via that method what do you do? @Coochie coo
speaking logically only enforces them into their echo chamber further and is proof to them that you are guilty of 'wrongthink'
do you speak to them as they speak to you? or do you enhance their echochamber loop?
lose-lose, but which do you lose less with?
Play their game before they play against you just call them a racist
nah there's more entertaining stuff to do than that
this was so subtle and so effective.
@Misomania yeah, that happened to me at a party, it was actually very embarassing, I was just trying to have honest discourse lol .... I #walkaway start pounding them back and if theres music, I'll go off and dance by myself...
they just shopped an image of this guy on the beach to have nipples 250% bigger, and didn't draw any attention to it at all. just let people notice for themselves.
“I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: Oh Lord, make my enemies ridiculous. And God granted it." - Voltaire
something that blows my mind is that people with opinions they know are wrong, view irrefutable evidence that they are wrong as confirming their bias that they must be right. The more it is obvious that they are wrong, the more they invest into the opinion that they know is wrong because they view it as being inseperable from their very existance.
We don't have to ridicule specific individuals; getting personal in that regard invites drama and backlash. But we can compare individuals to well-known lolcows like Big Red or Aids Skrillex.
how the hell can a human believe in something more intensely the more they understand that it's false?
@Misomania I'd suggest reading 'Explaining Postmodernism', and then reading 1984 *very slowly and carefully*.
These people who have such breathtaking control over their own perception of reality are not operating within the same philosophical framework as you. Not even close.
@Atkins oh I read them, but the concept is alien to me still. My mind fircely rejects BS like that
You are a modernist.
They are post-modernist.
I'm probably closer to a 4chan autist
These are not just buzzwords. These people actually operate as if reality were merely a mutually agreed upon hallucination.
What you think is a fact is to them merely an opinion based on nothing concrete.
the accomplishment of white people in world history is vastly suprerior to that of others
Your insistence upon it as a fact is evidence that you are in a privileged position of power and are attempting to oppress them.
who ever of our ancestors helped created dogs was a hero
yes
lol
Honestly this is the hero we need to reward.
GUYS