Gavin left the PBs (not really) and MSN is falsely claiming the FBI is calling the PB are extremists w/ "white nationalist" ties

For the average WalMart shopper, they lose overall to tarriffs

Likely have to rely on socialism not unlike the new deal in having people work on infrastructure for the companies paid by company tax

In the short term, yes

@R9b1t the people who discover them,

America is named after Amerigo Vespucci

@DrYuriMom and it still goes back to my point, that it is raising prices here. And if they stay forever, it might have 0 effect on anything because of the redistribution.

Europe?

Trump's tariffs are more for leverage than long term from what I understand, it is a negotiation technique

All I am saying is this is choosing favorites. Well I think we should tax robots to play favorites to humans. That's Americans First since for now at least automation aren't citizens.

How is it playing favourites to respond to protectionism with protectionism?

Europe wasn't discovered, it was just more land, and i believe it game from the greeks

but robots will help americans

Are any of you guys subscribed to @Timcast second channel and missing notifications?

We are using taxes to favor one player over another

dude i'm even subscribed to his 3rd channel, but theres no videos on it

In a situation where the one is already being favoured by taxes

But did you click the bell, and not get notified for some of his videos @Dr.Wol ?

The idea would be to slow automation growth so that it doesn't cause runaway problems

@DrYuriMom if you are taxing me. Is me turning around and taxing you redistribution? Or removing a redistribution.

I never click bells on any channel, idc about being the first, i watch youtube vids on my time 😄

Domestic production has always been favored. Trump has taken it to a whole new level. New in a modern sense at least.

I'm talking about Canada's protectionism

lower prices are always favored,

Trump just forces exterior prices up

Yes, grenade, it is. In a pure free market sense.

so that the lower price is local

In a pure market sense, it's attempting to remove the redistribution

You take 10 bucks from me for no reason, so I take it back.

You are telling buyers to pay more for a product because it's deemed socially beneficial to raise the prices to help domestic producers. That's still a distortion.

It's odd.

It's a distortion that levels out an existing distortion

But the people who pay the tarriffs are Americans.

and the people hurt by the other countries tarriffs are Americans...

You may like the distortion, but it's still playing favorites with tax policy.

I feel like we're going in circles here

We have an agreement. Every year we trade eggs for cheese at a 1:1 weight ratio

I'm just saying let's consider distorting the market in favor of human beings over robots.

In circles pfft

We are, since it's still arguable that the tariffs are bad anyway, and will cause problems if used as a long term solution.

One year I tell you Im going to favour cheese, so that we're now trading at a 1.1:1 ratio in my favour

Agreed