Message from @Dr.Wol

Discord ID: 515322892251037696


2018-11-23 00:26:39 UTC  

ban them outright

2018-11-23 00:26:42 UTC  

So you want to raise the cost of robot production to be like humans, therefore removing the advantage of them being able to produce things for cheaper meaning you can buy them for cheaper.

2018-11-23 00:26:47 UTC  

I go out of my way to avoid automatic sales stations in meat space

2018-11-23 00:26:58 UTC  

This is why redistribution doesn't work.

2018-11-23 00:27:01 UTC  

Or we tax them

2018-11-23 00:27:02 UTC  

I worked retail and know what our is like

2018-11-23 00:27:32 UTC  

If you give everyone basic income, that becomes the new poor who can't afford to live.

2018-11-23 00:27:37 UTC  

and besides, you are kina missing the point. Robots aren't competing with humans, here in the US, they are competing with slave labor over seas.

2018-11-23 00:27:41 UTC  

My point is I see it as directly comparable to the current trade debate

2018-11-23 00:27:54 UTC  

we don't

2018-11-23 00:27:54 UTC  

😛

2018-11-23 00:28:03 UTC  

You've not sufficiently argued that case

2018-11-23 00:28:06 UTC  

Robots are competing with humans

2018-11-23 00:28:35 UTC  

And will increasingly compete with humans

2018-11-23 00:28:36 UTC  

they don't compete, humans can't keep up they can't compete

2018-11-23 00:28:43 UTC  

Exactly

2018-11-23 00:28:51 UTC  

That's my point

2018-11-23 00:28:56 UTC  

Humans don't compete with robots, we make robots to do things we don't want to do.

2018-11-23 00:29:05 UTC  

So tax them for thier excess production

2018-11-23 00:29:05 UTC  

So, if you are against slavery, you have to be pro-robot

2018-11-23 00:29:11 UTC  

Robots will lower the costs

2018-11-23 00:29:17 UTC  

since you no logner need the labor payment

2018-11-23 00:29:18 UTC  

Which is why we should be afraid of thinking machines that can self improve

2018-11-23 00:29:25 UTC  

so instead of having to tax them to keep up with prices

2018-11-23 00:29:29 UTC  

just have the prices lowered

2018-11-23 00:29:56 UTC  

But then wealth will flow unrestrained to those who own the robots.

2018-11-23 00:30:03 UTC  

Why?

2018-11-23 00:30:10 UTC  

yeah, in just as small a portion

2018-11-23 00:30:20 UTC  

And we end up with even more inequality that the populace is already restive over

2018-11-23 00:30:28 UTC  

if i can buy a car for 100 dollars due to incredibly low costs,

the rich guy gets 100 dollars

2018-11-23 00:30:28 UTC  

If no one had wealth to give them anymore, how does it flow to them?

2018-11-23 00:30:34 UTC  

instead of like 80.000

2018-11-23 00:30:44 UTC  

It needs to flow from them back down.

2018-11-23 00:30:59 UTC  

Or they stop getting any, and they stop buying from other people

2018-11-23 00:31:05 UTC  

yeah, though just the normal progressive tax

2018-11-23 00:31:21 UTC  

Again that is post scarcity

2018-11-23 00:31:24 UTC  

you don't have to tax them more cuz people don't need that much to stay around

2018-11-23 00:31:31 UTC  

Again, are Americans willing to let a fraction of 1% of the population have greater than 80% of all wealth?

2018-11-23 00:31:37 UTC  

Post scarcity is once the robots can replace themselves, removing all need for labor

2018-11-23 00:31:38 UTC  

Once humans are no longer needed for labor you have post scarcity

2018-11-23 00:31:44 UTC  

They can