Not all means of production

Nazi Germany also allowed individuals to run and profit from running companies, but at the end of the day the state determined what happened to that company

Just the largest means

Codes is also wrong. China is far from capitalist

you are allowed to operate a business, but you don't own it

^

@Abel I disagree with the "also" though, as I never said China was communist, just that it wasnt capitalist

You guys seem to thing that your either capitalist or your not

the only capitalism that china use is state run capitalism

"state run capitalism" isn't capitalism

Its privately owned by people that are part of the party

Economic systems merge

so yes

And twist

its not true capitalism

Many of the biggest companies are still state owned.

it's like saying you have a democracy when you have only one viable candidate

China Telecom (中国电信集团公司), for example, is state owned.

its private businesses free market controlled by Xinpings inner group

it's not private if it's owned by the government

What they do, though, is issue shares that can be publicly traded.

by definition

no its "privately owned by members of the chinese communist party"

Those usually appear in stock exchanges in Hong Kong (H shares), Shanghai and Shenzhen.

thats what they call it

@Walsp It's not capitalist if the public isn't allowed to own and sell it

the reality as we all are aware is not private

which is a distinction without a difference

I am not really sure what to call this.

It's socialism with a pink ribbon on top

its capitalist if its a "Free market " but we know they monitor it

I suppose it's all hybrid nowadays.

yes

Allowing people to own minor shares in a company doesnt mean it's a hybrid

Then I guess America is not capitalist

Heavily monitored

they use a Hybrid system of it but not completely

so how much of Monsanto does the state own?

Walsp actually gets it

there was a article on it but i fear it is propaganda

Be warned