I disagree with strasser on lot of stuff and he did a lot of stupid shit

Lol what Capitalism is not a bad thing

Capitalism is the most basic form of internationalism.

Gravy needs us

A protectionistic socialism that seeks to serve the people who live in that area and are natives, your volk, and seeks to provide them with the best quality of life possible, taking it back to humanity simplest form of taking care of the tribe.

Remember it took all of the world's greatest super powers to destroy a country the size of Texas.

Except you can't. How exactly do you plan to "take care of the tribe?" Government redistribution of wealth?

There is no redistribution in socialism

That's marxism

tf kind of Socialism are you talking about?

And how exactly is international trade a bad thing?

Socialism socialism

Real socialism

The kind that can only work on a national level

National Socialism

Marxism hijacked the term

You realize there are tons of forms of Socialism right?

No, that is where people are fucked up, there is not need to be a redistribution of the volks wealth, instead key industries that do not affect the lives of civilians, on a close scale, such as raw metals, raw energy resources, etc are controlled by the state, but people's businesses, along with industry such as food, and farm materials like used to make clothes, and goods, are to stay private property of the volks.

And yes, National Socialism involves redistribution of wealth, going by the Nazi platform for National Socialism.

No it doesn't

Yea, that's just Statism. Not Socialism.

I'm going to upload a pdf to this channel for your convenience

It answers all your questions

In national socialism, private businesses were not affected, corporations and businesses thrived, private property was a respected thing, firearm ownership was legal, etc.

By one of the most famous socialists too

Dunno, points 14 and 15 sound a lot like redistribution of wealth to me

>arguing in favor of socialism whatsoever.

@Justin Burger (Major-GA) They weren't? Pretty sure the Nazis tightly controlled industries like the auto industry.

They were not government owned, but government contracted.

That's like saying the US government owns the people who make our guns.

When the government is setting quotas, price controls, etc, I'd say that's more than just contracting.

That's ownership.

@Graviter no, that's regulation

So subsidies and welfare for the old, requires redistribution of wealth? Remember taxes in Nazi Germany are lower than the US, the ability to control a couple key industries, gave them the monetary ability to finance such things.

When the government tells you what products to make, how to make them, what to charge for them, and how many to make, how exactly do you own your company?

Yes, that is redistributing wealth.

That is redistribution of wealth.

i just think Hitler did nothing wrong

GG @Maggie The Magpie, you just advanced to level 11!