No, that is where people are fucked up, there is not need to be a redistribution of the volks wealth, instead key industries that do not affect the lives of civilians, on a close scale, such as raw metals, raw energy resources, etc are controlled by the state, but people's businesses, along with industry such as food, and farm materials like used to make clothes, and goods, are to stay private property of the volks.

And yes, National Socialism involves redistribution of wealth, going by the Nazi platform for National Socialism.

No it doesn't

Yea, that's just Statism. Not Socialism.

I'm going to upload a pdf to this channel for your convenience

It answers all your questions

In national socialism, private businesses were not affected, corporations and businesses thrived, private property was a respected thing, firearm ownership was legal, etc.

By one of the most famous socialists too

Dunno, points 14 and 15 sound a lot like redistribution of wealth to me

>arguing in favor of socialism whatsoever.

@Justin Burger (Major-GA) They weren't? Pretty sure the Nazis tightly controlled industries like the auto industry.

They were not government owned, but government contracted.

That's like saying the US government owns the people who make our guns.

When the government is setting quotas, price controls, etc, I'd say that's more than just contracting.

That's ownership.

@Graviter no, that's regulation

So subsidies and welfare for the old, requires redistribution of wealth? Remember taxes in Nazi Germany are lower than the US, the ability to control a couple key industries, gave them the monetary ability to finance such things.

When the government tells you what products to make, how to make them, what to charge for them, and how many to make, how exactly do you own your company?

Yes, that is redistributing wealth.

That is redistribution of wealth.

i just think Hitler did nothing wrong

GG @Maggie The Magpie, you just advanced to level 11!

so what's y'alls opinion on the jews

@Tommunist you know how there's people that devote their entire existence to doing good and helping others?

Well, the opposite must also be true

Enter, the jew

Yes because being of a certain religion means you are incapable of community service and helping others

@Graviter butthurt

Evidently, yes

Or do you believe Soros is really the philanthropist that the media makes him out to be?

No fuck Soros.
But not because he's Jewish, but because he's a fucking disgusting Communist

And subhuman trash

You've just given an accurate description of his tribe as an average

They're sll commie or capitalist

As it goes for the usurer

Non Jews can be Communists too

And there are Jews that aren't Communist

Ben Shapiro being a perfect example.

Manlet Benny Boy the subverter