is it? or is democracy being used to force a non democratic bordering on autocratic form of rule as a means to an end?

There is no terms or definitions to limit them.

The Intersectional Marxists in power

because it seems we're reverting to fuedalism

I don't think that's quite what's happening.

That is because social media giants are placing us in bubbles.

But I do think this idea of narrowing the public discourse should be an obvious call for concern.

We will eventually end up with a single ideology or type of government.

Instead of what is considered a mixed and grand experiment of United States.

You also have universities and the like actively trying to remove the protections and norms of society.

single person or small group leading a world wide nation. Which has roles like how bankers can act in the form of princes and tech ceos as barons...

They changed the constitution to a "Living Document" making it much easier for them to claim the constitution should be changed through mob rule.

Hell before they that, they said Congress had the authority to change the constitution how they saw fit.

You ever smack a bitch in the face while fucking her

To be honest, I am rather sick of people saying that our "Inherited Rights" are up for debate.

Same

They are not, end of story.

@Misomania it's not feudalism though. Feudalism is the pledging of military power to create micro-states. This is more subtle, it's creating a propaganda department and letting it run amok. A democracy with a secret police to a degree.

More like Modern China than Feudal England.

China has freedom of speech and elections. You just aren't allowed to ask questions or make discussions that "threaten the safety and harmony of society and the state" and your election choices are rather narrow.

A constitutional right *is not enough*

thinking more of what will happen with this globalism and corporatism mixing

Why even call it free speech when it's clearly not

Propaganda value. The Social Justice left is all for Free Speech too, you will notice.

They just have a very peculiar definition and very peculiar set of ideas on what counts as "free"

Very narrow set of definitions.

That keeps shrinking.

Yes, so they *say* they have free speech

@Misomania again, still not feudalism. The left has this notion of corporations acting as feudal states, but it's just not accurate and most companies tend not to care.

It doesn't get us anywhere to use their redefinitions of free speech

That's my point. You have to be very particular and dedicated to the principle of freedom of speech.

Simply waving "free speech" is never enough.

<:TimThink:482277772497125378>

https://www.theepochtimes.com/nearly-two-thirds-of-non-citizens-access-welfare-programs-report-finds_2729720.html

non citizen?

Yes.

illegals?

Yes.