Message from @Walsp

Discord ID: 527941802905305098


2018-12-27 20:07:11 UTC  

Makes it even harder to do anythign against them.

2018-12-27 20:07:23 UTC  

In war we allied ourselves with the ussr we have no principles

2018-12-27 20:07:32 UTC  

If we attack Turkey for attacking Kurds, we thrust the world into Nuclear war.

2018-12-27 20:07:38 UTC  

I hate how nukes exist.

2018-12-27 20:07:41 UTC  

Reality isn't kind... and reality is a bitch with no-win situations.

2018-12-27 20:08:19 UTC  

Of course not, but we're already there and have been for years and years and we've caused huge amounts of damage to the ME and if you have any honour you would do the right thing and protect the people who fight side by side with you in iraq, not abandon them

2018-12-27 20:08:57 UTC  

Only thing I can think of is allow them to declare a nation from the territory they already own.

2018-12-27 20:09:24 UTC  

Turkey would be against the international community if they attack the kurds.

2018-12-27 20:09:48 UTC  

That wont happen because of Syria, Turkey, Iran, and Russia, none of those countries want the Kurds

2018-12-27 20:10:13 UTC  

The Kurds are toast

2018-12-27 20:10:22 UTC  

Regardless if we help or not.

2018-12-27 20:10:31 UTC  

We are half-way around the world.

2018-12-27 20:10:43 UTC  

Our nation, we can't mobilize that fast if the nations decide to wipe them out.

2018-12-27 20:10:49 UTC  

Not to mention the other two thirds of Iraq don't want Kurds either

2018-12-27 20:10:50 UTC  

But do you think it would be in good faith, since we've started so much shit there, to help them?

2018-12-27 20:10:58 UTC  

the Turkish want to kill the Kurds as they link all kurdish people to Terrorist cells . since Erdogan thinks Armenian Accident Is the correct word for Genocide

2018-12-27 20:11:15 UTC  

2 very important tidbits of info!
1 Turkey is not in any way a member of the EU and can not be kicked out.
2 Turkey does not have nuclear weapons.

2018-12-27 20:11:46 UTC  

and 3 . they like to put a layer of greese on the Turkey when your hungary and russian to the kitchen

2018-12-27 20:11:53 UTC  

but theres norway i can eat that

2018-12-27 20:12:14 UTC  

we dont have nukes Dusty lol

2018-12-27 20:12:19 UTC  

god damnit

2018-12-27 20:12:23 UTC  

-_-

2018-12-27 20:12:28 UTC  

US made us Disarm them

2018-12-27 20:12:40 UTC  

we had like 3-4

2018-12-27 20:12:47 UTC  

but was during apartheid

2018-12-27 20:12:49 UTC  

Under NATO nuclear weapons sharing, the United States has provided nuclear weapons for Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Turkey to deploy and store.[97] This involves pilots and other staff of the "non-nuclear" NATO states practicing, handling, and delivering the U.S. nuclear bombs, and adapting non-U.S. warplanes to deliver U.S. nuclear bombs. However, since all U.S. nuclear weapons are protected with Permissive Action Links, the host states cannot easily arm the bombs without authorization codes from the U.S. Department of Defense.[98] Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga acknowledged the presence of U.S. nuclear weapons in Italy.[99] U.S. nuclear weapons were also deployed in Canada as well as Greece from 1963 to 1984. However, Canada withdrew three of the four nuclear-capable weapons systems by 1972. The single system retained, the AIR-2 Genie, had a yield of 1.5 kilotons, was designed to strike enemy aircraft as opposed to ground targets, and might not have qualified as a weapon of mass destruction given its limited yield.[100]

Members of the Non-Aligned Movement have called on all countries to "refrain from nuclear sharing for military purposes under any kind of security arrangements."[101] The Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI) has criticized the arrangement for allegedly violating Articles I and II of the NPT, arguing that "these Articles do not permit the NWS to delegate the control of their nuclear weapons directly or indirectly to others."[102] NATO has argued that the weapons' sharing is compliant with the NPT because "the U.S. nuclear weapons based in Europe are in the sole possession and under constant and complete custody and control of the United States."[103]

2018-12-27 20:12:58 UTC  

"South Africa produced six nuclear weapons in the 1980s, but dismantled them in the early 1990s.

In 1979, there was a detection of a putative covert nuclear test in the Indian Ocean, called the Vela incident. It has long been speculated that it was a test by Israel, in collaboration with and support of South Africa, though this has never been confirmed. South Africa could not have constructed such a nuclear bomb until November 1979, two months after the "double flash" incident. South Africa signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1991."

2018-12-27 20:13:21 UTC  

i know of friends in the military said they only build 3 the others were still being produced

2018-12-27 20:13:32 UTC  

hmmm

2018-12-27 20:13:51 UTC  

" However, since all U.S. nuclear weapons are protected with Permissive Action Links, the host states cannot easily arm the bombs without authorization codes from the U.S. Department of Defense."

2018-12-27 20:13:53 UTC  

An single nuke could in sense, push the world into nuclear war.

2018-12-27 20:14:04 UTC  

It would be amusing if the disarmament was required before apartheid.

2018-12-27 20:14:14 UTC  

Many nations has the nukes set on a hair trigger.

2018-12-27 20:14:20 UTC  

IF a nuke is launched, all nukes are launched.

2018-12-27 20:14:25 UTC  

hey peoplez

2018-12-27 20:14:31 UTC  

what i find the most fucked up is that "Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty" is just to make a handfull of countries have nukes . if we were allied with the US we would have been allowed to keep our nukes but because we are 2nd world and friends with china that would have caused problems

2018-12-27 20:14:36 UTC  

Oh hey hey :)

2018-12-27 20:14:56 UTC  

Whats all up to? Coochie at work today?

2018-12-27 20:15:06 UTC  

Howdy

2018-12-27 20:15:10 UTC  

No I've been off thankgoodness 😊