Message from @Paradox

Discord ID: 528039553974665217


2018-12-28 02:34:46 UTC  

what's ridiculous is assuming intent

2018-12-28 02:35:10 UTC  

løgner @exaudi632 jesus elsker

2018-12-28 02:35:21 UTC  

Ah, yes, I had a song stuck in my head mr. judge, that is why I yelled fire. Please don't punish me.

2018-12-28 02:35:35 UTC  

heck, maybe you didn't know and your friends dared you to, there's a ton of reasons

2018-12-28 02:36:17 UTC  

I think we took the conversation to it's conclusion

2018-12-28 02:36:51 UTC  

sure, you think that actions in themselves have an assigned intent. I think differently.

2018-12-28 02:36:58 UTC  

Paradox, I can believe it isn't intentional to cause harm if it's a six year old. but an adult is a different story

2018-12-28 02:37:14 UTC  

I'm sure you have already, but have you talked to any VW bus clubs? I use to own a 1967 vw bus and they are very customizable, just a thought @Timcast

2018-12-28 02:37:14 UTC  

even then, why are people solely believing a 6 yo is beyond me

2018-12-28 02:37:20 UTC  

I don't think that actions have defined intent, but they do have defined consequences

2018-12-28 02:37:33 UTC  

if you yell fire in a crowd, someone will panic

2018-12-28 02:37:49 UTC  

not convinced all people are that stupid

2018-12-28 02:38:03 UTC  

Not sure if VW buses are a big deal on the eastcoast howver

2018-12-28 02:38:38 UTC  

No, but I think there is reasonable evidence to assume intent, in this case. That is how our courts work though. It isn't perfect.

2018-12-28 02:38:53 UTC  

in which case?

2018-12-28 02:39:10 UTC  

The case of yelling fire in a crowded area.

2018-12-28 02:39:32 UTC  

i haven't assumed intent, i thought that's what we were discussing

2018-12-28 02:39:52 UTC  

and i was disagreeing

2018-12-28 02:40:20 UTC  

you haven't, hiniku is saying that there may be reasonable evidence in the case of yelling fire in a theatre

2018-12-28 02:40:27 UTC  

to convince a court of malicious intent

2018-12-28 02:40:40 UTC  

which is why i am a free speech absolutist, like i said at the beginning, according ot tim's definition.

2018-12-28 02:40:42 UTC  

I think there might be some miscommunication, when did I say you were agreeing?

2018-12-28 02:41:39 UTC  

oh was that an appeal to authority?

2018-12-28 02:41:42 UTC  

How about this Paradox

2018-12-28 02:41:47 UTC  

i was disagreeing with that.

2018-12-28 02:41:48 UTC  

Let's see if we can agree on this

2018-12-28 02:41:51 UTC  

too

2018-12-28 02:42:19 UTC  

If someone has malicious intent to hurt people and yells fire in a crowded theatre, should they be punished?

2018-12-28 02:42:26 UTC  

nope

2018-12-28 02:42:35 UTC  

what?

2018-12-28 02:42:35 UTC  

I think that if your actions cause physical harm to another person, whether your actions were physical or verbal, you deserve punishment. I'm a consequentialist

2018-12-28 02:42:37 UTC  

because yelling fire doesn't hurt people

2018-12-28 02:42:38 UTC  

Ok, well, that is stupid.

2018-12-28 02:42:44 UTC  

it's speech

2018-12-28 02:43:01 UTC  

the people being morons and panicing and trampling eachother is what hurts people, they should be punished for being too dumb

2018-12-28 02:43:10 UTC  

The action of yelling fire is causing the actions of panic which is causing harm...

2018-12-28 02:43:13 UTC  

and...them trampling eachother is that punishment

2018-12-28 02:43:16 UTC  

that's like saying dropping a crate on someone to kill them doesn't hurt people

2018-12-28 02:43:26 UTC  

it's the gravity

2018-12-28 02:43:47 UTC  

You guys see the vids of the transformer explosion in NYC