Message from @xorgy

Discord ID: 528638886600114177


2018-12-29 17:37:09 UTC  

"Other institutions have announced preparations for a partial shutdown. The Smithsonian said it will be able to use existing funds to keep its 19 museums and national zoo open to the public through Jan. 1."

2018-12-29 17:37:37 UTC  

@Redneo so chancellor as a title is more similar to a countries Prime Minister rather than the President?

2018-12-29 17:38:29 UTC  

Might be

2018-12-29 17:39:59 UTC  

Shed also be in control in a very limited set of emergencies, like a surprising defensive war on the terretory of the BRD(Bundesrepublic Deutschland, federal republic of germany).

2018-12-29 17:40:25 UTC  

fair enough

2018-12-29 17:41:53 UTC  

@AHeroQuest rieding the news about it right now and thansk to everyone btw :3 lets keep the conversation going 😄

2018-12-29 18:12:54 UTC  

I got my mechanical keyboard in the mail now

2018-12-29 18:18:02 UTC  

👍

2018-12-29 18:18:06 UTC  

hmm

2018-12-29 18:18:33 UTC  

The anti-boycott laws seem unnecessarily broad.

2018-12-29 18:19:12 UTC  

They should simply require that you not attempt to use your position of employment to enhance a boycott.

2018-12-29 18:19:13 UTC  

boycott is sexist

they have to call it personcott

2018-12-29 18:19:50 UTC  

The anti-BDS laws are blatantly unconstitutional. And treasonous.

2018-12-29 18:20:35 UTC  

i.e. if you are a speech pathologist, that you do not use your SP sessions to produce that form of political outcome

2018-12-29 18:20:45 UTC  

well, I don't know if they're unconstitutional

2018-12-29 18:21:00 UTC  

it's not that you're being asked not to boycott

2018-12-29 18:21:13 UTC  

it's that you're being restricted from the job

2018-12-29 18:21:54 UTC  

for example, if I suddenly agreed with white nationalists, companies could almost certainly require that I not have those opinions, even public employers.

2018-12-29 18:22:00 UTC  

Restraining political advocacy in the workplace has nothing whatsoever to do with requiring a fucking oath to buy Israeli.

2018-12-29 18:22:12 UTC  

it's not exactly an oath to buy israeli

2018-12-29 18:22:33 UTC  

It's an oath to not not-buy Israeli.

2018-12-29 18:22:38 UTC  

it's just more or less "in order to be employed here, you must not be actively discriminating against Israeli businesses"

2018-12-29 18:22:42 UTC  

it's not an oath

2018-12-29 18:22:48 UTC  

in the purest sense at least

2018-12-29 18:22:54 UTC  

it is an employment agreement

2018-12-29 18:22:58 UTC  

It's disgusting.

2018-12-29 18:23:04 UTC  

idunno

2018-12-29 18:23:13 UTC  

I think it's kinda questionable

2018-12-29 18:23:41 UTC  

especially as it pertains to the private property of the employed

2018-12-29 18:24:00 UTC  

but it is not plainly a speech issue

2018-12-29 18:24:06 UTC  

Private property and private activity.

2018-12-29 18:24:28 UTC  

employers, even public employers, are not required to tolerate all speech without employment penalty.

2018-12-29 18:24:59 UTC  

I think Hooters should be allowed to only hire sexy bebs

2018-12-29 18:25:01 UTC  

they simply can not punish the public at large for speech

2018-12-29 18:25:03 UTC  

my dumb ass got a possession charge...

2018-12-29 18:25:07 UTC  

But dat jsut me

2018-12-29 18:25:13 UTC  

so do you guys think

2018-12-29 18:25:15 UTC  

@stoneyhippo don't do that

2018-12-29 18:25:26 UTC  

that maybe going the jury nullification route would be a good idea?

2018-12-29 18:25:30 UTC  

no