Message from @devpav
Discord ID: 528638973871128586
@Redneo so chancellor as a title is more similar to a countries Prime Minister rather than the President?
Might be
Shed also be in control in a very limited set of emergencies, like a surprising defensive war on the terretory of the BRD(Bundesrepublic Deutschland, federal republic of germany).
fair enough
@AHeroQuest rieding the news about it right now and thansk to everyone btw :3 lets keep the conversation going 😄
I got my mechanical keyboard in the mail now
👍
hmm
The anti-boycott laws seem unnecessarily broad.
They should simply require that you not attempt to use your position of employment to enhance a boycott.
boycott is sexist
they have to call it personcott
The anti-BDS laws are blatantly unconstitutional. And treasonous.
i.e. if you are a speech pathologist, that you do not use your SP sessions to produce that form of political outcome
well, I don't know if they're unconstitutional
it's not that you're being asked not to boycott
it's that you're being restricted from the job
for example, if I suddenly agreed with white nationalists, companies could almost certainly require that I not have those opinions, even public employers.
Restraining political advocacy in the workplace has nothing whatsoever to do with requiring a fucking oath to buy Israeli.
it's not exactly an oath to buy israeli
it's just more or less "in order to be employed here, you must not be actively discriminating against Israeli businesses"
it's not an oath
in the purest sense at least
it is an employment agreement
It's disgusting.
idunno
I think it's kinda questionable
especially as it pertains to the private property of the employed
but it is not plainly a speech issue
Private property and private activity.
employers, even public employers, are not required to tolerate all speech without employment penalty.
I think Hooters should be allowed to only hire sexy bebs
they simply can not punish the public at large for speech
my dumb ass got a possession charge...
But dat jsut me
so do you guys think
@stoneyhippo don't do that
that maybe going the jury nullification route would be a good idea?
no
it is not at your disposal