Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 535609559017062400
@Misomania Not to mention one side comming together other side seems to eat its own
That wouldn't bother me as much. Instead of Celebrites who use their production value team to make them look better.
Pewdiepie is ok but he can't compete against a potential billion hindus wanting to hear bollywood songs
I don't think anything's gonna beat Rewind 2018 in quite some time
or whatever it is tseries promotes
I mean think of it... if a Celebrity created his own animation, his own scripts, his own work on a youtube channel. Then yeah I would support him. He would have made it regardless of his celebrity status because he gots talent and skill.
its a hoax, T-series is propped up falsely
He didn't have anyone else create shit.
just look at the viewcount on their videos
I would support that celebrity. Would you guys too?
they get less in 10 hours what PewDiePie gets in 1 hour
I wonder if they have any street shitting videos
He is competing on a level playing field with the other youtubers.
Can't really do something about name recognition. So I can't fault them for that.
i'd support any creator im interested in, provided its interesting 😛
But if they play on a level playing field, I would support that celebrity.
no thot gaming channels tho 😛
why support thot channels? they put up sexy pics for free yo
thats why i dont
they also just ruin the normal stuff
latter is prio ofc 😛
lmao
blitzcrieg your gf
so romantic
@Timcast well rico is precisly for situations where no illegal act has been proven. With the SPLC, conspiracy to crimes could indeed be applicable. I dont think either will stick but conspiracy doesnt crequire any explicit agreement, an implicit agreement is enough. A conspirator can be held legaly responsible for any crimes commited by a co-conspirator so long as the act falls in the scope of the conspiracy or is a forseeable consequence of it. Say, people physicly attack people based on SPLC information. This would of course require prove of mens rea which is very hard to impossible.
:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>
:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Subscribestar (exclusive Discord rewards available):
<https://www.subscribestar.com/Timcastt>
And RICO, yeah, the don may not have told people to kill a person, just that the person is a problem to be solved...
I dont think either will stick but its within the types ofthings where it would be applicable.
Though i would argue that this may simply be a wakeup call about the fact that RICO may be a bad idea.
But then i make no qualms about the fact that i will oppose the "rebuilding" of society should it ever break apart
Sputnik just got rekt
society itself allways treated men like trash. At least provably so since the the old testament was written
and Russia Today
Can i proof sharia and mosaic law were primarily informed by the desires of women? Not conclusivlyfor mosaic law, sharia however is quite clearly institutionalised feminism. And we can ask muslim men and women what they think which confirms just that. On the flip side,we also have evidence of the shit women did in the west, such asintrouduce the tender years doctrine and prohobition.
Im very glad however about feminism.
Allways better than traditionalism
Prohibition did start from temperance movement, which was spearheaded by women.
exactly
Im really not a fan of traditionalism, but I think the feminists are on to something much worse