cause hes bald af and his patter is pish

@HonkeyKong Merry Christmas!

f4gg0t

oof

Can we get a <:OOF:439608033929330689> in the chat

<:OOF:439608033929330689>

Who does that sound like? @Ruger

<:OOF:439608033929330689>

@RatKing yer ma

Could electrons teleport across mossad's hairline?

*cough* don *cough*

quantum computing is one of these things the popularisers bang on about but you're not actually going to hear anything useful about for a couple decades if you're lucky

@󠀀󠀀AK playing a dangerous game

*the plot thickens*

it's neat to keep up with though. once it gets applied in the real world the race is on.

I do not understand quantum computing, it just confuses the fuck out of me

it's almost as if niche research has a vested interest in getting non-specialists interested in their feild

@WestendPark benefits bandit

yo wot

iirc quantum was meant to be good for repetitive shit,not necessarily complex shit

But I really don't know

@Liam it just means that the rather than working between 1 and 0 it can work at any voltage between those

Quantum computing is super super messy

so not binary but ......

but the problem with voltages is that once you touch it it changes.

fucka u

It’ll never be practical beyond very niche computational tasks

but yeah, im looking forward to seeing where it goes. i can actually see uses for it already.

I just dont see how they get around functional error checking without inducing decoherence

Just due to the resources required to keep one operating

@Data Pagan what I was saying

fucka

cold, lots of cold and super conductors.

It’s incredibly niche

I’ll happily stay in my x86-64 comfort zone

It’s materials where the breakthroughs will be

The cooling alone makes it wildly impractical

once you have no voltage drop across something you can pretty much do w/e you want with it.

Lolfire is probs right. Its niche but who knows what the future holds for related breakthroughs

But then you’re asking for 100% efficiency

And that’s not gonna happen